Telangana High Court
WP/42410/2015 of B.Brahmaiah S/o Sivaiah Vs The APSRTC, represented by its, on 31 December 2015
COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.42410 of 2015 Between: B. Brahmaiah, S/o. Sivaiah, Aged about 47 years,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABADFOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OFANDHRA PRADESH
THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FIFTEEN
Present
Between:
B. Brahmaiah,S/o. Sivaiah, Aged about 47 years,OCc: APSRTC Driver E.No.725221,R/o. Jayabharat Reddy Colony,12[th] Ward, Nidubrolu,Ponnur Mandal, Guntur District.
.. Petitioner
AND
The APSRTC,
Rep. by its Regional Manager APSRTC,Guntur Region, Guntur District & another
.. Respondents
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner is a driver in the respondent Corporation. After conducting disciplinary proceedings, the petitioner wasvisited with punishment of deferment of annual increments for aperiod of two years with cumulative effect by order, dated18.10.2014, of the disciplinary authority. The appeal filed by thepetitioner was rejected by order, dated 23.12.2014. Thepetitioner thereafter claims to have filed a review before thereviewing authority. Contending that the said review is yet to bedisposed of and challenging the order of punishment, this writpetition is filed.
2. When the matter is taken up, both the learned counsel forthe petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel for therespondent Corporation agreed for disposal of the writ petitionwith a direction to consider the review filed by the petitioner on01.09.2015.
3. Having regard to the same, the Writ Petition isdisposed of, directing the reviewing authority to consider thereview filed by the petitioner on 01.09.2015, subject to itsmaintainability and pass appropriate orders permitted by lawwithin a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneouspetitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed.
_____________________
P.NAVEEN RAO, J
Date: 31[st] December, 2015
KL
Date: 31[st] December, 2015
KL