Telangana High Court
WP/24525/2004 of M/s. Blue Birds High School, Rayapura, Hanamkonda, Vs The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and on 29 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO: 24525 of 2004 Between: M/s. Blue Birds High School, Rayapura, Hanamkonda, Warangal
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAWRIT PETITION NO: 24525 of 2004
Between: M/s. Blue Birds High School, Rayapura, Hanamkonda,Warangal rep by Correspondent, M.A. Majeed, S/o M.A. Ali R/o Hanamkonda, Warangal... PETITIONERAND1 The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and AuthorityUnder Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952, Sub-RegionalOfficer, Balasamudram Hanamkonda, Warangal District2 The Recovery offficer, Employees Provident Fund OrganisationSub-Regional Officer, Balasamudram Hanamkonda, Waragnal District...RESPONDENTSPetition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the order dt 27-8-2004 made in APSRO/WL/ENF/19739/WGL/7A Order/2003-04 passed by the 1st respondent herein,assessing the liability of the petitioner for payment of provident fund contribution asillegal and arbitrary.Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.A.PRABHAKAR RAO
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.R.N.REDDY
The Court, at the admission stage, made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The impugned order passed by the first respondent under Section 7-A of theEmployees Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (for short ‘theAct’) is challenged in the present writ petition.
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for therespondents and both of them have consented to the disposal of the writ petition atthe stage of admission itself.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that petitioner is ready to pay thedemanded amount of Rs.2,21,853/- and Rs.49,593/- in 12 monthly installments,which would start from 10-01-2005. The learned Standing Counsel for the respondents expressed noobjection for payment of the amounts in installments.
4. In view of the same, petitioner is hereby directed to pay the demanded amount in12 monthly installments starting from 10-01-2005, and if the petitioner fails to pay any of the installments, the respondentsare at liberty to proceed further in the matter.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the admission stage.
__________________
N. V. RAMANA, J
December 29, 2004
MRR / SVV
Copy to:
1 The Assistant Provident Fund Commissioner, and Authority Under Section 7-A of the Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act 1952, Sub-Regional Officer, balasamudram Hanamkonda, Warangal District 2 The Recovery offficer, Employees Provident Fund Organisation Sub-Regional Officer, Balasamudram Hanamkonda, Waragnal District 3 Two C.D. Copies.