Telangana High Court

WP/16562/2008 of Mahatma Gandhi Abhudaya Rythu Sankshema Sangam, Vs The Settlement Officer / Joint Collector, West Godavari on 31 December 2008

COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO : 16562 of 2008 Between: Mahatma Gandhi Abhudaya Rythu Sankshema Sangam, Regd. No.184/2008,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

WEDNESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MS JUSTICE G.ROHINIWRIT PETITION NO : 16562 of 2008

Between:

Mahatma Gandhi Abhudaya Rythu Sankshema Sangam, Regd.No.184/2008, Kalepatnam, Mogaltur Mandal, W.G. District, rep. by its President, N. Rama Krishnam Raju.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 The Settlement Officer / Joint Collector, West Godavari Eluru 2 The Tahsildar, Mogaltur Mandal, Mogaltur, W.G. District.

3 The Sub-Registrar, Mogaltur Mandal, Mogaltur, W.G. District.

.....RESPONDENT(S)

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to to issue order direction more particulary one in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus declare the proceedings in Roc.110/2008 (DT)dt.10.06.2008 as illegal arbitrary and without having any power under theprovisions of Estate Abolition Act 1948 and consequentially set aside thesame by directing the 3rd respondent to entertain the registrations inrespect of the lands situated in the villages i.e., Kalepatnam (East),Kalepatnam (West), Komatitippa, Pathapadu and Jaganadhapuram ofMogaltur Mandal and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.P.R.K.AMERANDRA KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR REVENUE

The Court made the following :

THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI

WRIT PETITION No. 16562 of 2008

O R D E R :

Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this court to withdraw the writ petition.

Permission is accorded.

Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

______________

G. ROHINI, J

Date: 31-12-2008KLP

Page 1 of 1

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead