Telangana High Court

WP/32282/2012 of Immadi Padma Vs The Government of A.P Rep.by its Secretary, on 29 December 2016

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32282 OF 2012 ORDER: This petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner as Anganwadi worker at Annarugudem Anganwadi Centre No.112, Annarugudem Village, Tallada Mandal,

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.32282 OF 2012

ORDER:

This petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not appointing the petitioner as Anganwadi worker at Annarugudem Anganwadi Centre No.112, Annarugudem Village, Tallada Mandal, Khammam District, though the petitioner was selected in the interview held on 23.06.2011, as illegal and arbitrary and for a consequential direction to the respondents to appoint the petitioner as Anganwadi worker.

This Court while admitting the writ petition on 19.10.2012 granted interim direction to the 3[rd] respondent to consider the petitioner’s representation dated 01.08.2012, in accordance with law and take appropriate decision thereon duly communicating the same to the petitioner by way of a reasoned order and to complete the said exercise within four weeks from the date of the said order. Interim order is in force and no counter is filed.

Since the relief sought in the writ petition is granted by virtue of interim order dated 19.10.2012, I deem it appropriate to dispose of the writ petition in terms of the interim order.

Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of in terms of interim order dated 19.10.2012 passed by this Court in WP.MP.No.41157 of 2012. No order as to costs.

As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in the writ petition, shall stand closed.

_____________________________

A.RAJASHEKER REDDY, J

11.11.2016

tk

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead