Telangana High Court
WP/39974/2014 of K. RQAMKRISHNAIAH Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, on 30 December 2014
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY Writ Petition No.39974 of 2014 Dated 30th December, 2014 Between: K.Ramakrishnaiah …Petitioner And The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
Writ Petition No.39974 of 2014
Between:
Dated 30thDecember, 2014
K.Ramakrishnaiah
And
…Petitioner
The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal Secretary, CivilSupplies Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others …Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Suresh Kumar Reddy Kalava Counsel for the respondents: AGP for Civil Supplies (AP)
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action ofthe respondents in not releasing the essential commodities to thepetitioner’s shop No.23 of Mogarala Village, Pakala Mandal, ChittoorDistrict as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, the learned Assistant Government Pleader forCivil Supplies (AP), on instructions, submitted that so far noproceedings under Section 6-A of the Essential Commodities Act,19555 have been initiated and that the petitioner’s authorisation hasnot been suspended. He has further submitted that if the petitionerproduces the demand draft before respondent No.4, essentialcommodities will be allotted in his favour.
In the light of the above submissions of the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting thepetitioner to approach respondent No.4 for receiving the allotment order. On receiving such allotment order, the petitioner shall submitdemand draft to respondent No.4, who thereupon shall allot essentialcommodities to the petitioner.
As a sequel to disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.50120of 2014 shall stand disposed of as infructuous.
30[th] December, 2014VGB
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J