Punjab and Haryana High Court
CRM-M/44336/2013 of HEENA RANI AND ANR. Vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. on 31 December 2013
of 2013 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Crl. Misc. No. M- 44336 of 2013(O&M) Date of Decision: December 31, 2013. Heena Rani and another ...... PETITIONER(s) Versus State of Punjab and others ...... RESPONDENT (s) CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA Present:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH
Crl. Misc. No. M- 44336 of 2013(O&M)Date of Decision: December 31, 2013.
Heena Rani and another
...... PETITIONER(s)
Versus
State of Punjab and others
...... RESPONDENT (s)
CORAM:- HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAM CHAND GUPTA
Present:Petitioners in person with Mr. Gautam Thapar,Advocate, for the petitioners.
*****
RAM CHAND GUPTA, J.(Oral)
Heard.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners willbe satisfied if Senior Superintendent of Police, Shaheed Bhagat Singh Nagari.e. respondent No.2 is directed to take appropriate action in accordance withlaw on application dated 26.12.2013 (Annexure P-5), made to him by thepetitioners.
As per averments made in the petition both the petitioners aremajor. Date of birth of petitioner No.1-Heena Rani, as per copy of certificateof Matriculation Examination, Annexure P-1, is 21.12.1995 and date of birthof petitioner No.2 –Gurpreet Singh as per copy of certificate of Matriculation Examination, Annexure P-2, is 14.12.1994. They got married on 26.12.2013as per Marriage Certificate, Annexure P-3. Photographs of the marriage areAnnexure P-4.
In view of the limited prayer made by the learned counsel for thepetitioners and without going into the merits of the claim raised by thepetitioners in the petition, this petition is disposed of with direction torespondent No.2 - i.e. Senior Superintendent of Police, SBS Nagar to takeappropriate action in accordance with law on application dated 26.12.2013(Annexure P-5) as already stated to have been moved to him by thepetitioners.
However, it is made clear that this order will be having no effecton the validity of alleged marriage of petitioners or on any other civil orcriminal proceedings instituted against petitioner no.2 as per law.
( RAM CHAND GUPTA )December 31, 2013.JUDGE‘om’