Telangana High Court
WP/18272/2010 of Mandalapu Vijaya Bhaskara Rao, Vs The District Collector, on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.18272 of 2010 Date: 30.12.2010 Between: Mandalapu Vijaya Bhaskara Rao ..... Petitioner AND The District Collector, Eluru, and others .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2: Assistant
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.18272 of 2010
Between:
Date: 30.12.2010
Mandalapu Vijaya Bhaskara Rao
AND
..... Petitioner
The District Collector, Eluru, and others
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri K. Ramesh Babu Counsel for Respondent Nos.1 and 2:Assistant Government Pleaderfor Panchayat Raj Counsel for Respondent No.3: Sri G. Elisha, learned standing counsel forGram Panchayats The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“…to issue a writ, direction, order or orders moreparticularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaringthe action of the respondents in resorting to construct abuilding in petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.0.14 cents inSy.No.95/2 of Mathamgudem Village, Lingapalem Mandal,West Godavari District as illegal, arbitrary, highhanded,malafidy, ultra virus, abuse of power and against to principlesof natural justice apart from being violative of Article 300A ofConstitution of India and consequently direct the respondentsnot to interfere with petitioner’s peaceful possessionenjoyment of his land in the interest of justice and pass suchother order..”
At the hearing, Sri K. Ramesh Babu, learned counsel for thepetitioner, seeks permission of this Court for withdrawal of the writpetition with liberty to his client to work out his remedies by way of civilsuit. To that effect, he addressed letter dated 29.12.2010 to theRegistry.
The request of the learned counsel for the petitioner isaccepted.
The Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn withliberty in terms of the prayer made.
As a sequel to dismissal of the writ petition, interim order dated16.08.2010 in W.P.No.18272 of 2010 and interim order dated29.09.2010 in W.P.M.P.No.23072 of 2010 are vacated, andW.P.M.P.No.23072 of 2010 is dismissed as infructuous.
________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
30[th] December, 2010GHN