Telangana High Court
WP/32426/2023 of M/s. Ganpati Sugar Industries Limited Vs Southern Power Distribution Company of Telangana Limited on 29 December 2023
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE [ 3300 ] ...PETITIONER PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA WRIT PETITION NO: 324260F 2023 Between: M/s. Ganoati Suoar lndustries Limited,
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY THREE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRt JUSTICE NAGESH BHEEMAPAKA
WRIT PETITION NO: 324260F 2023
Between:
M/s. Ganoati Suoar lndustries Limited, Administrative Office at. g_2_4ggtl,Road No.'4. Baniira - Hyd#b;o l'sobo5+,'r"tangana. s ri Amit Kumar cha ltitiq, kra ti"rtv.-ni riis itr " u""ld, L K;i6;;F:;Ii*lt Rep. by its iivyr,CFo,Sangareddy (M), Sangareddy Di.iriti _"scj)zgi,'tu,rnsrn".
...PETITIONER
AND
1.Chairman at. southern 6-'l-50, Power and Mint Mana!ing Comoounrt Distribution.company of rerangana Limited, Director.HyOeiaOa'O - SOO6'65:%;"grm corporate Rep. by ilsoffice2The Chief General Manaoer (lpC), Southern power Distribution Company ofTetangana Limited, 6-r-sb, ilinttb;il*i,';ifiL?ffi _ 500063, Tetangana.Tetangana Limited, 6-r-sb, ilinttb;il*i,';ifiL?ffi _ 500063, Tetangana.3The Executive Director (Commercial), Telangana State power Coordinationcommittee, Vidyut souriha, kMEGirad,'FivZl,lJoZii:s00082, retansana.committee, Vidyut souriha, kMEGirad,'FivZl,lJoZii:s00082, retansana.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Articre 226 0f the constitution of rndia praying that in thecircumstances stated in the affidavit fired therewith, the High court may bepleased to issue a writ, order or direction more particurarry one in the nature ofwrit of Mandamus a)decraring the action of the 1st Respondent in not permiftingthe synchronisation to the 15MW bagasse-based cogeneration prant of thePetitioner company situated at Kurbgoor/Fasa{wadi virage, sangareddy Mandar,Sangareddy District, Telangana as arbitrary and illegal, besides being contrary tothe provisions of the Erectricity Act, 2003 and being in vioration of petitionersrights guaranteed under Articres 14 and i9(1) (g) of the constitution oflnd ia.b)directing the 1st Respondent to permit synchronisation to the 15MWbagasse-based cogeneration plant of the petitioner company situated at Kulbgoor/Fasalwadi [Village, Sangareddy Mandal' Sangareddy District' ][Telangana]c)and/or Pass 1A NO:1 [OF][ 2023]
Petition [under Section 151 CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit [fired ][in ][support ][of ][the ][petition, ][the ][High ][court ][may be ][preased ][to direct]the 1"r [Respondent ][to ][permit ][synchronization ][to ][the ][1 ][5MW ][bagasse-based]cogeneration [plant ][of ][the ][Petitioner Company situated ][at ][Kulbgoor/Fasalwadi]Village, Sangareddy [Mandal, Sangareddy ][District' ][Telangana']
IA NO:2oF 2023
Petition under [Section ][151 ][CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit [filed ][in ][support ][of ][the ][petition' ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to]receive the [additional documents ][in ][W ][P ][No ][32426 ][ol ][2023 ][']
lA NO: 3 oF [2023]
Petition [under Section ][151 ][CPC ][praying ][that ][in ][the ][circumstances ][stated ][in]the affidavit [filed in ][support ][of ][the ][petition' ][the ][High Court may ][be ][pleased ][to]modify the [Order ][dated ][28'11 ]['2023 ][in ][lA ][No ][1 ][of ][2023 in ][WP ][No' ][32426 ][ol ][2023 to]theextentofdirectingtheRespondentstopermitSynchronisation/gridconnectivityofpetitioner'sl5MWBagassebasedco-genpowerplantsituatedatKulbgoor/Fasalwadi [Village, Sangareddy Mandal' Sangareddy District' ][Telangana]State immediatelY.
Counsel [for the Petitioner: ][SRI ][CHALLA ][GUNARANJAN]
Gounsel [for the Respondents: ][SRI ][R' VINOD REDDY' ][SC FOR ][TSPDCL]
The Court [made ][the ][following: ][ORDER]
I
HON'BLE SRI [WSTICE ][NAGESH BHEEMAPAT{A]
WRIT PETITION [NO.324][26 ][0F ][2023]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Today when the [matter ][ts][ taken ][uP ][for ][hearing,]Sri Nishanth, [learned ][counsel representing ][Sri ][Challa]Gunaranjan, [learned ][counsel ][for ][petitioner ][seeks]of this [Court ][to ][withdraw the ][writ ][petition']permission
2. Permission [is ][accorded ][to ][withdraw the ][writ ][petition']
3. Accordingly, the [writ ][petition ][is ][dismissed ][as]withdrawn. No [costs]
Miscellaneous [petitions, ][if ][any, pending ][in ][this ][writ]petltlon shall [stand ][closed.]
SD/-A.V.S.PRASADASSTSTANT CEGTT'ERARu,/SECTION OFFICER
//TRUE COPY//
To,
1. One CC to Sri. Challa Gunaranjan, Advocate [OPUC]2. One CC to Sri R. Vinod Reddy, SC for TSPDCL[OPUC]3. Two CD Copies TJGJPe^c,, HIGH COURT
DATED:2911212023
ORDER
,6E[STATE]qa2I [Jt\N ][2t2[]ooi.ttDE S PPf WP.No.32426 ot 2023
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION AS WITHDRAWNWITHOUT COSTS.
i:{r[\rrr.]