Telangana High Court

WP/19445/1994 of KOVVURU SUBBI REDDY Vs CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 November 2001

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 19945 of 1994 Between: 1. M. Subadramma, W/o Muninagulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala,

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED

WRIT PETITION NO : 19945 of 1994

Between:

1. M. Subadramma, W/o Muninagulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

2. S. Ramakrishnaiah, S/o S. Gangaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

3. P. Pandurangaiah, S/o Munaswami Naidu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

4. K. Radhakrishnan , s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

5. K. Janardhan, s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

6. K. Venugopal, s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

7. M. Krishna Reddy, S/o M. Venkataswami Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

8. K. Govindamma, D/o Venkataiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

9. P. Darma Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

10. K. Chenchaiah, S/o Kuppa Mandadi, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

11. V. Murugesan, S/o Venkataswami Naidu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

12. P. Lakshmamma, W/o Venkatesam, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

13. P. Raniyamma, w/o Venkata Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

14. R. Devarajulu, s/o Rami Reddy,R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

15. N. Mangamma, W/o Subbarayulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

16. K. Chandraiah, s/o Venkatrathnam, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

17. G. Sriramulu, s/o G. Pullappa, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

18. E. Venkataiah, s/o E. Chengaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

19. A. Rajeswari, w/o Sidda Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

20. B. Subbaiah, s/o Papaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

21. B. Subbaramaiah, S/o Papaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

22. M.L. Ushabhatt, w/o Krishna Bhatt, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

23. G. Lakshmamma, W/o Nagamumaswami, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

24. Chittoor Krishnaiah, S/o Chengaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

25. P.V. Krishna Murthy, S/o P. Venkatamunichetty, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.

..... PETITIONERS

AND

1 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist.

2 The Sepcial Deputy Collector,

Land Acquisition, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist. Tirupathi, Chittoor dist.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring theProceedings issued in Roc.No.213/80 dated 28-9-1994 directing the petitioners tohand over the site and structures as illegal and direct the respondents not todispossess the petitioners from their houses till the house sites are handed over tothe petitioners and constructed their houses in the plots allotted to them.

Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.GANGA RAMI REDDY

Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU

The Court made the following:

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORAL ORDER

Sri M. Adinarayana Raju, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-TirumalaTirupathi Devastanams submitted that cause in the writ petition does not survive foradjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.

Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.

08.07.2004

________________

KK/Glv

To

1 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep by ira Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist.

2 The Sepcial Deputy Collector, Land Acquisation, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist. Land Acquisation, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist.

3. Two C.D. copies.

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead