Telangana High Court
WP/19445/1994 of KOVVURU SUBBI REDDY Vs CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE on 29 November 2001
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED WRIT PETITION NO : 19945 of 1994 Between: 1. M. Subadramma, W/o Muninagulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF JULYTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GHULAM MOHAMMED
WRIT PETITION NO : 19945 of 1994
Between:
1. M. Subadramma, W/o Muninagulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
2. S. Ramakrishnaiah, S/o S. Gangaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
3. P. Pandurangaiah, S/o Munaswami Naidu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
4. K. Radhakrishnan , s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
5. K. Janardhan, s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
6. K. Venugopal, s/o K. Jayaramaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
7. M. Krishna Reddy, S/o M. Venkataswami Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
8. K. Govindamma, D/o Venkataiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
9. P. Darma Reddy, S/o Venkata Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
10. K. Chenchaiah, S/o Kuppa Mandadi, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
11. V. Murugesan, S/o Venkataswami Naidu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
12. P. Lakshmamma, W/o Venkatesam, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
13. P. Raniyamma, w/o Venkata Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
14. R. Devarajulu, s/o Rami Reddy,R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
15. N. Mangamma, W/o Subbarayulu, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
16. K. Chandraiah, s/o Venkatrathnam, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
17. G. Sriramulu, s/o G. Pullappa, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
18. E. Venkataiah, s/o E. Chengaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
19. A. Rajeswari, w/o Sidda Reddy, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
20. B. Subbaiah, s/o Papaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
21. B. Subbaramaiah, S/o Papaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
22. M.L. Ushabhatt, w/o Krishna Bhatt, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
23. G. Lakshmamma, W/o Nagamumaswami, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
24. Chittoor Krishnaiah, S/o Chengaiah, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
25. P.V. Krishna Murthy, S/o P. Venkatamunichetty, R/o Ward No.4, Block -B, Tirumala, Chittoor Dist. Tirumala, Chittoor Dist.
..... PETITIONERS
AND
1 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep by its Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist.
2 The Sepcial Deputy Collector,
Land Acquisition, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist. Tirupathi, Chittoor dist.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring theProceedings issued in Roc.No.213/80 dated 28-9-1994 directing the petitioners tohand over the site and structures as illegal and direct the respondents not todispossess the petitioners from their houses till the house sites are handed over tothe petitioners and constructed their houses in the plots allotted to them.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR. P.GANGA RAMI REDDY
Counsel for the Respondents: MR.M.ADINARAYANA RAJU
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER
Conclusion
Sri M. Adinarayana Raju, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent-TirumalaTirupathi Devastanams submitted that cause in the writ petition does not survive foradjudication and the writ petition has become infructuous.
Recording the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
08.07.2004
________________
KK/Glv
To
1 Tirumala Tirupathi Devasthanams, Rep by ira Executive Officer, Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist. Tirupathi, Chittoor Dist.
2 The Sepcial Deputy Collector, Land Acquisation, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist. Land Acquisation, Tirumala Tirupati Devasthanams, Tirupathi, Chittoor dist.
3. Two C.D. copies.