WP/27924/2005 of G. Ravinder S/o Thirupathi Swamy Vs Municipal Corporation of Hyderabad rep by on 29 December 2005

Arguments

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH

WRIT PETITION No.27924 OF 2005

Dated: 29-12-2005BetweenG. Ravinder. S/o Thirupathi Swamy,Occ: Consultant, R/o. 206, AnuradhaApartments, Srinagar Colony,Hyderabad.

…PETITIONER

ANDMunicipal Corporation of HyderabadRep. by its Commissioner, Tank Bund,Hyderabad and another.…RESPONDENTSORDER:Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel for therespondents.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner purchased an extent of 627 Sq.yds equivalent to 524.17 Sq. mts of land in premises bearing Municipal No.9-4-29/103/5together with structures situated in Survey Nos.13 and 103 corresponding to T.S.No.1/1 &1/2, Block ‘D’, Ward 12 of Shaikpet Village, Hakeempet Mandal, Hyderabad. After purchasing the said property, the petitioner made an application to the first respondent tomutate the same in his name as the owner of the same and the said application wasaccepted and necessary changes were made vide proceedings date 17.06.2005. Petitionermade another application to the first respondent dated 21.07.2005 seeking permission forconstruction of ground plus three upper floors. Pursuant to the said application therespondents raised certain objections. Though the petitioner complied with the saidobjections permission has not been sanctioned so far. Further the petitioner submittedanother application dated 26.10.2005 and the respondents have passed no orders grantingpermission for construction of building.

Without going into the merits of the case to the extent whether the petitioner is entitled forconstruction of ground plus three upper floors according to the relevant rules and guidelinesissued from time to time, this Court is of the opinion that there is no justification for theinordinate delay on the part of the respondents in not considering and disposing therepresentations of the petitioner. However, the second respondent is directed to considerand dispose the representation of the petitioner dated 26.10.2005 within four weeks fromtoday.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

______________V. ESWARAIAH, J