Telangana High Court
WP/9553/2011 of Mallidi Rama Krishna Reddy Vs The Chief Engineer on 29 December 2011
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY W.P.No.9553 of 2011 Date : 29-12-2011 Between: Mallidi Ramakrishna Reddy and others .. Petitioners and The Chief Engineer, A.P. TRANSCO, Vidyuth Soudha, Khairtabad, Hyderabad and others .. Respondents Counsel for petitioners : Sri K. Gani Reddy Counsel for respondent
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY
W.P.No.9553 of 2011
Date : 29-12-2011
Between:
Mallidi Ramakrishna Reddy
and others ..
Petitioners
and
The Chief Engineer,
A.P. TRANSCO, Vidyuth Soudha,
Khairtabad, Hyderabad and others ..
Respondents
Counsel for petitioners : Sri K. Gani Reddy Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4 : Sri O. Manohar reddyCounsel for respondent Nos.5 & 6 : Smt. JyothieswarGogineni Counsel for respondent No.7 : --
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioners who claim to be owning lands adjacentto the land over which an electrical sub-station is proposedto be constructed in Sy.No.309/1 of Pasalpudi village,Rayavaram Mandal, East Godavari District, filed this WritPetition on apprehension that there is a likelihood ofelectrical lines being drawn over the lands belonging tothem, affecting their agricultural activity.
In the counter-affidavit filed by respondent No.5, hehas categorically stated that the sub-station is beingproposed to be constructed over an extent of Ac.0-48 centsof land in Sy.No.309/1 belonging to Smt. Karri Lakshmi w/o.Venkata Reddy and donated to APEPDCL for constructionof a sub-station. The counter-affidavit also dispelled theapprehension of the petitioners that the electrical line maybe erected over their lands if the sub-station is constructed. It is also categorically stated that the poles and the electricalwires will be located along the public road (Puntha road) andthe same will not be taken through the petitioners’ lands.
At the hearing, Sri Gani Reddy, learned counsel forthe petitioners, stated that if the electrical lines do not passover the petitioners’ lands, they have no objection for construction of the proposed sub-station.
In the light of the contents of the counter-affidavitreferred to above and the submission of the learned counselfor the petitioners, the Writ Petition is disposed of asinfructuous.
As a sequel, interim order dated 13-4-2011 is vacatedand WPMP No.11828/2011/2011 and WVMP No.3250/2011are disposed of as infructuous.
________________________
Justice C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
Date : 29-12-2011
AM