Telangana High Court
WP/26771/2006 of S.K.Abdullah, Vs The Deputy Transport Commissioner AND Secretary, on 22 December 2006
Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI WRIT PETITION NO.26771 OF 2006 DATED: 22-12-2006 Between : S.K. Abdullah … Petitioner And 1. The Deputy Transport Commissioner & Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore, Nellore District and Another.. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE
THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.26771 OF 2006
DATED: 22-12-2006
Between :
S.K. Abdullah … Petitioner
And
1.The Deputy Transport Commissioner &Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore, Nellore District andSecretary, Regional Transport Authority, Nellore, Nellore District and Another.. .. Respondents THE HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
WRIT PETITION NO.26771 OF 2006
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action ofthe respondents in seizing the vehicle of the petitioner vide VehicleCheck Report No.17527, dated 18-10-2006 as arbitrary and illegal.
It is pleaded by the petitioner that the vehicle in question is aPower Triller which is used as Goods Carrier for carrying the goods forshort distances and the value of the same is Rs.10,000/. It is alsopleaded that the allegations under the vehicle check report are withoutany basis and as a matter of fact the petitioner possesses all therelevant documents.
Having regard to the specific case of the petitioner and havingregard to the nature of the allegations, it would be appropriate for therespondent to consider the request of the petitioner for release of thevehicle pending enquiry. However, it appears that no applicationseeking release of the vehicle has been made before the respondentso far.
In the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem itappropriate to dispose of the writ petition granting liberty to thepetitioner to make appropriate application before the 1[st] respondent forrelease of the vehicle in question, in which event the same shall beconsidered and appropriate orders be passed in accordance with lawwithin a period of one week thereafter. No costs.
_______________
G. ROHINI, J.
Dt. 22-12-2006
gbs
Note: - CC in 2 days.