Telangana High Court
WP/13020/2003 of Shaik Mastan Bi, Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh, on 27 December 2006
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI Writ Petition No.13020 of 2003 Dated: December 27, 2006 Between: Shaik Mastan Bi, D/o. Khasim Saheb, aged about 19 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Kothapatnam, Prakasham District, and others. … Petitioners And
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
HON’BLE Ms. JUSTICE G. ROHINI
Writ Petition No.13020 of 2003
Dated: December 27, 2006
Between:
Shaik Mastan Bi, D/o. Khasim Saheb, aged about19 years, Occ: Student, R/o. Kothapatnam,Prakasham District, and others.
… Petitioners
And
Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Secretary,Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad,and others.
… Respondents
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
This writ petition is filed seeking a declaration that the action ofthe respondents in denying concessional bus-passes to the studentsof the fifth respondent-college on par with other recognized colleges isarbitrary and illegal.
When the matter is taken up for consideration, it is brought to mynotice that identical writ petitions with identical prayer were disposedof by this Court in W.P.No.28965 of 1997 and batch dated 15-03-1999
with directions as under:
“Under the circumstances, the Writ Petitions aredisposed of with a direction that the petitioners – students andsimilarly situate students shall be extended the benefit ofscholarships for Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes andBackward Classes and they shall also be issuedconcessional bus and railway passes in accordance with theirrespective rules and regulations without reference to thestipulations made by the Intermediate Board in respect ofthese two benefits while granting recognition. If anyapplications are already pending before the authorities forextension of these benefits, the same shall be considered inaccordance with the rules and regulations.
Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms ofthe above judgment. No order as to costs.
__________________JUSTICE G. ROHINI.
December 27, 2006MRR