Telangana High Court

CC/2281/2022 of B.Sandhya Rani Vs Sri Somesh Kumar, I.A.S on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2281 OF 2022 Contempt case under Sections 10 io 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to punish the Respondents herein for

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 2281 OF 2022

Contempt case under Sections 10 io 12 of Contempt of Courts Act to [punish]the Respondents herein for violating, disobeying the Orders of the High Courtdaled. 18-02-2022 in l.A.No. 1 of 2022, in W.P.No. 8952 of 2022

Between:

B.Sandhya Rani, Age about 40 years, ZPHS, lVedak, Medak District.

...PetitionerMlrit Petitioner

AND

Sri Somesh Kumar, l.A.S, S/o Not to the petitioner Chief Secretary , Secretariat,Hyderabad State of Telangana.

... Responde nt

Counsel for the Petitioner: SRl. M. VINOD KUMAR

Counsel for the Respondent: GP FOR SERVICES-I

The Court made the following: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMARContemCaNo 2281of2022

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

The present contempt case rs fired aileging disobedience to the orderpassed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2022 in W.p.No.B95Z of 2022,dt.tg.02.2022.

2. Learned Government pleader for Services I submits that therespondents have now compried with the above said order of this court, videMemo No.Spl./Secretary peshil2,Zt_462, d',I3.OS.2OZ2 rejecting the case ofthe petitioner, and therefore, prays for closure of the contempt case. A copyof the same is served on the rearned counser for the petitioner across the Barand also is placed on record of this Court.

3' Having regard to the fact that the above order of this court has beencomplied with by the respondents, there is no disobedience, much ress wilfurdisobedience, to the order ofthis Court, on the part ofthe respondents.4. Accordingly, the Contempt Case is closed.5. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.

N

Sd/. CH. VENKATE$WARLUDEPUTYC{F#JI4B

//rRUE coPY//

SECTION OFFICER

To,

1. Two CCs to Gp for Services-l High Court for the State of Telangana atHyderabad.(OUT)3. ?. 9nu Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two 9nu Two Two Two CD Copies.[qg ][to ][sRt. ][v. ][vtruoo ][KUMAR, ]Advocate lopucl

3. ?. 9nu Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two 9nu Two Two Two CD Copies.kam p-

3. ?. 9nu Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two ?. 9nu Two 9nu Two Two 9nu Two Two Two CD Copies.

HIGH COURTDATED:3011212022

ORDER

CC.No.2281 of 2022

CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE.

1>

1\t[E ][STA][IA]i zE [lril?t?3]

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead