Telangana High Court
WP/740/2004 of Sri Swarna Bharathi Educational Society, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh on 28 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION NO : 740 of 2004 Between: Sri Swarna Bharathi Educational Society, Pakabanda, Near Mamata
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION NO : 740 of 2004
Between:
Sri Swarna Bharathi Educational Society, Pakabanda, Near Mamata GeneralHospital, Khammam, Andhra Pradesh, Represented by its President Prof.S.Pullaiah
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Government of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its Principal Secretary, Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad. Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.
3 All India Council for Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex,
I.P.Estate, Represented by its Member Secretary.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an appropriate Order, direction or a Writ more particularly one in the nature ofa Writ of Mandamus declaring that the proceedings bearing No.8772/EC.2/2003dated 30-12-2003 is unenforceable and is liable to be struck down and furtherdeclare that the petitioner Society is entitled to the increase in annual intake by 180seats by introduction of three additional courses of (1) Mechanical B.Tech DegreeCourse (2) Civil B.Tech Degree Course and (3) M.C.A. in addition to the existingcourses namely (1) Electronics & Communication Engineering (2) ComputerScience & Engineering (3) Electrical & Electronic Engineering in Swarna BharathiInstitute of Science and Technology, Pakabanda, Khammam from the academicyear 2004-2005.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.DEEPAK MISHRA, ADVOCATE FOR MR.KOKA
RAGHAVA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent No.1: GP FOR HIGHER EDUCATIONCounsel for the Respondent Nos.2 and 3: MR.S.S.PRASAD
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Sri Deepak Mishra, learned counsel representing Sri Koka RaghavaRao, the learned counsel for the petitioner, represents that the causein this writ petition does not survive for adjudication.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
VGB
_______________
28.12.2004
To
1 The Principal Secretary, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Higher Education, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad.
2 The Commissioner of Technical Education, Government of Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad. Hyderabad.
3 The Member Secretary, All India Council for Technical Education, Indira Gandhi Sports Complex, I.P.Estate.
4 2CCs to the Government Pleader for Higher Education, High Court Buildings, Hyderabad (OUT)