Telangana High Court
WP/1876/2017 of FAHAD BIN KHALED AL- AMOODI, Vs PRL.SECY., HOME DEPT., HYD., AND 4 OTHERS, on 28 December 2017
S.V.BHATT W.P.No.1876 OF 2017 ORDER:- Having considered the averments in the affidavit and the counter affidavit, this Court is of the view that ends of justice are met by directing the respondents to take note of the circumstances as on date while reviewing the rowdy sheet challenged in the
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE S.V.BHATT
ORDER:-
W.P.No.1876 OF 2017
Having considered the averments in the affidavit and the counter affidavit, this Court is of the view that ends of justice are met by directing the respondents to take note of the circumstances as on date while reviewing the rowdy sheet challenged in the writ petition. The petitioner is at liberty to file explanation/ representation within two weeks from today by enclosing copy of this order. This Court has no reason to doubt that as and when such explanation/ representation is filed by the petitioner, the same is examined in the light of the law laid down by this Court in W.P.No.4688 of 2012 which was disposed of on 16.03.2017 and in the judgments reported in Sunkara Satyanarayana v. State of Andhra Pradesh[1] and B. Satyanarayana Reddy v. State of Andhra Pradesh[2].
With the above observation, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any pending, stand closed.
28[th ]December, 2017 Lrkm
_____________
S.V. BHATT, J
1 2000(1) ALD (Crl.) 117 (AP)
2 2004(1) ALD (Crl.) 38 = 2004(2) ALT (Crl.) 115