Telangana High Court
WP/27147/2006 of G. Venkat Rama Rao S/o Chandrashekar Rao Vs Government of A.P., rep by its Principal Secretary, on 29 December 2006
GODA RAGHURAM WRIT PETITION No. 27147 of 2006 DATED: 29-12-2006 Between: G.Venkat Rama Rao …Petitioner and Government of A.P., represented by its Principal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition) Department, Hyderabad and others …Respondents. HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAM
WRIT PETITION No. 27147 of 2006
DATED: 29-12-2006
Between:
G.Venkat Rama Rao
…Petitioner
and
Government of A.P., represented by itsPrincipal Secretary, Revenue (Land Acquisition)Department, Hyderabad and others …Respondents.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE GODA RAGHURAMW.P.No. 27147 of 2006
ORAL ORDER:
The petitioner’s land is sought to be acquired by the issuance ofa notification, dated 9-11-2006, under Section 4 (1) of the LandAcquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’). Urgency clause has beeninvoked under Section 17 (4) of the Act and enquiry under Section 5-Aof the Act has been dispensed with mechanically without dueapplication of mind, is the complaint.
The impugned notification states that the acquisition is for thepurpose of allotment of house-sites for weaker sections. Thisrequirement is not of such an emergent nature as would justifyinvocation of the urgency clause and dispensing with the enquiryunder Section 5-A of the Act. The enquiry under Section 5-A of the Actis a salutary statutory provision intended for affording a reasonableopportunity to the owners of the lands to object to the acquisition onany relevant grounds as they wish to submit.
Page 1 of 2
In the aforesaid circumstances, the decision in the impugnednotification to invoke the urgency clause and dispensing with theenquiry under Section 5-A of the Act is declared irrational andunsustainable. The respondents are directed to issue notice to thepetitioner for submission of objections, if any, to the proposal toacquire the lands. On the petitioner’s submitting his objections within the time stipulated in the notice, the same shall be considered and anappropriate decision taken duly communicating the decision to thepetitioner simultaneously with the recommendations made after theenquiry under Section 5-A of the Act by the acquiring authority. Thepetitioner shall not be dispossessed pending communication of thedecision to them consequent on the enquiry under Section 5-A of theAct.
The writ petition is disposed of as above at the stage ofadmission, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and thelearned Government pleader for Land Acquisition. There shall,however, be no order as to costs.
_______________________
GODA RAGHURAM, J
29-12-2006GRR
Page 2 of 2
Loading citations and judicial treatment…