Gujarat High Court
SCA/8681/1997 of SAJAN JESABHAI Vs STATE OF GUJARAT on 2 December 1997
HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8681 of 1997 For Approval and Signature: Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Sd/- ============================================================ 1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? NO 2. To be referred
IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
SPECIAL CIVIL APPLICATION No 8681 of 1997
For Approval and Signature:
Hon'ble MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT Sd/-
============================================================
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
1. Whether Reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgements? NO
2. To be referred to the Reporter or not? NO
J
3. Whether Their Lordships wish to see the fair copy of the judgement? NO
4. Whether this case involves a substantial question of law as to the interpretation of the Constitution of India, 1950 of any Order made thereunder? NO
5. Whether it is to be circulated to the Civil Judge? NO
-------------------------------------------------------------- SAJAN JESABHAI
Versus
STATE OF GUJARAT
-------------------------------------------------------------- Appearance:
MS MAMTA R VYAS for Petitioner
MR DA BAMBHANIA, Addl. GP for the respondents.
-------------------------------------------------------------- CORAM : MISS JUSTICE R.M.DOSHIT
Date of decision: 02/12/97
ORAL JUDGEMENT
Rule. At the suggestion of the Court, learned Additional Government Pleader Mr. Bambhania has accepted the advance service of the petition and waives service of rule on behalf of the respondents. On the facts and in the circumstances of the case and with the consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing today.
2. Ms. Vyas, the learned advocate appearing for the petitioner has submitted that against the order of termination of his service which is confirmed by the appellate authority, the petitioner has, on 27th July, 1997, preferred a revision application before the respondent No. 3. Same however has not been decided as yet. Mr. Bambhania has submitted that a reasonable time be granted within which the respondent No.3 shall decide the revision application preferred by the petitioner herein. Petition is partly allowed. Respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the revision application made by the petitioner on 27th July, 1997 ( Annexure "G" to the petition ) within a period of two months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order. Rule is made absolute to the aforesaid extent only. There shall be no order as to costs. Direct Service is Permitted.
���*****
Vyas