Telangana High Court

CRLP/2416/2009 of KODATHALA KATAMAIAH Vs STATE OF A.P. AND ANOTHER on 30 December 2010

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TEN PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2416 OF 2009. Between: Kodathala Katamaiah … Petitioner V/s. The State of Andhra Pradesh Represented by its

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE ANDHRA PRADESHAT HYDERABAD

THURSDAY THE THIRTYETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TEN

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2416OF 2009.

Between:

Kodathala Katamaiah … Petitioner

V/s.

The State of Andhra PradeshRepresented by its Public Prosecutor,High Court of Andhra PradeshHyderabad & Anr. … Respondents Counsel for the Petitioner : Smt. P. Rajani Counsel for the Respondents : Addl.Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order : (order follows 2[nd] page)

CRIMINAL PETITION No.2416OF 2009

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

O R D E R:

This Criminal Petition is filed under section 482 Cr.P.C.seeking to quash the FIR in Cr.No. 39 of 2009 of Muddanur PoliceStation, Kadapa district in so far as the petitioner is concerned and topass such other suitable orders as this court may deems fit andproper in the circumstances of the case.

2. The petitioner is arrayed as A-2 in the above crime. Thelearned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the above FIR whichwas registered for the offence under section 5 of ExplosiveSubstances Act on the basis of arrest of A-1 while he was found inpossession of country made bomb. On the basis of the confessionmade by A-1, the petitioner is arrayed as A2 in the above crime.Hence, the present FIR against the petitioner can be quashed. Hefurther submitted that the petitioner is not having any knowledgeabout possession of country made bomb by A-1.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-A2 as well asthe learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the State.Perused the records.

4. Though the crime was registered for the offence undersection 5 of Explosive Substances Act, prima facie, the same has tobe investigated into regarding the involvement of A-2. In any event,the Investigating Officer is directed to consider the statement and alsothe contention of the petitioner-A2 herein in the investigation and takeappropriate steps.

5. With the above direction, the Criminal Petition is disposed of.

______________________

JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

30-12-2010I s L

CRIMINAL PETITION No. 2416 OF 2009

Circulation No. 40Date:30-12-2010Court Master: IsLComputer No.43

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead