Telangana High Court
WP/24277/2004 of Saladi Yasoda, Vs The Warangal Municipal Corporation, on 27 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24277 of 2004 Between: Saladi Yasoda, W/o. Anjaiah, R/o. 25-8-38, Diesel Colony,
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY SEVENTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24277 of 2004
Between:
Saladi Yasoda, W/o. Anjaiah,
R/o. 25-8-38, Diesel Colony, Kajipet, Warangal.
AND
..... PETITIONER
The Warangal Municipal Corporation, Rep. by its Commissioner, Warangal.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue writ or direction preferably writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of therespondent in disposing of the latest application the inaction of the respondent indisposing of the latest application of the petitioner dated. 22-11-2004 for change ofname in respect of house No. 25-8-38, Diesel Colony, Kajipet, Warangal, as illegal,arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct therespondent to take immediate steps to effect change in the records by disposing ofthe application dated. 22-11-2004 within a reasonable time.
For the Petitioner: MR.KOWTURU VINAYA KUMAR, Advocate For the Respondent: MR.K.VENUGOPAL REDDY, SC for Warangal Municipal Corporation The Court at the stage of admission made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel forrespondent-Municipal Corporation and with their consent the writ petition itself isdisposed of at the stage of admission.
The petitioner claims to be owner of the house bearing No.25-8-38 situated at Diesel colony, Kajipet within the limits of respondent-Municipal Corporation. Her grievance is that since demand notices for the househave been issued in the name of one N. Padamarao, she made a representation,dated 22-11-2004 to the respondent for mutation of her name as the owner thereof inthe Municipal records, but no action has been taken so far. Hence, the writ petition.
Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I deem it appropriate todirect the respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner, dated 22-11-2004 and pass appropriate orders thereon in accordance with law, expeditiously.
With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of at the stage of admission.No costs.
______________
N.V. RAMANA, J
Svv
To
1. The Commissioner, Warangal Municipal Corporation, Warangal.
2. Two C.D.copies.