Telangana High Court
WP/24657/2004 of K. Mallaiah, E-93510, Vs The Divisional Manager, APSRTC, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU WRIT PETITION NO : 24657 of 2004 Between: K. Mallaiah, E-93510, S/o Ramaiah, C/o Narayankhed Bus
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 24657 of 2004
Between:
K. Mallaiah, E-93510, S/o Ramaiah,
C/o Narayankhed Bus Depot,Medak District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1. The Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Medak Division, Sanga Reddy,Medak District.
2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC,
Zaheerabad Bus Depot, Medak District.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleasedto issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ ofMandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in issuing theproceedings No. E1/1(32)/94-JHB, dt. 27-7-1994 as illegal, arbitrary and unjustand consequently set aside the proceedings No. E1/1(32)/94-JHB, dt. 27-7-1994 issued by the 2nd respondent.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.Y.SUBBA RAO
Counsel for the Respondents.: MR.V.T.M.PRASAD (S.C.FOR APSRTC)
The Court at the admission stage, made the following:
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K.C. BHANU
WRIT PETITION NO : 24657 of 2004
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
In respect of the very same impugned proceedings dated 27-07-1994, anappeal is pending before the 1[st] respondent and the appropriate orders have tobe passed by the 1[st] respondent.
2. Therefore, I deem it consider to dispose of the writ petition with a direction tothe 1[st] respondent to dispose of the appeal.
3 . Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1[st]respondent to pass appropriate orders on the appeal filed by the petitionerwithin a period of two months from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. Inthe circumstances, there shall be no order as to costs.
December 29, 2004
___________________
Kvr
1. The Divisional Manager, APSRTC, Medak Division, Sanga Reddy,Medak District.
2. The Depot Manager, APSRTC, Zaheerabad Bus Depot, Medak District.
3. 2 C.D copies.