Telangana High Court
WP/28445/2008 of M.D.Wahiuddin Vs The Regional Manager, Andhra Pradesh Forest on 30 December 2008
SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANA W.P. No. 28445 of 2008 Oral order: The petitioners state that the 1st respondent, namely the Regional Manager, without conducting enquiry and issuing notice, has passed the impugned order dated nil, served on the petitioner on 02.12.2008, directing them remit an
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Conclusion
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE N.V. RAMANAW.P. No. 28445 of 2008
Oral order:
The petitioners state that the 1[st] respondent, namely theRegional Manager, without conducting enquiry and issuing notice, haspassed the impugned order dated nil, served on the petitioner on02.12.2008, directing them remit an amount of Rs.2,17,459.50 withinthirty days, failing which the same will be recovered in lumpsum fromthe arrears, if any, payable to them or in instalments from the salarypayable to them.
When the writ petition was taken up, the learned StandingCounsel appearing on behalf of the respondents submitted that the writpetition be disposed of treating the impugned order as show causenotice calling upon the petitioners to submit their explanation. Thelearned counsel for the petitioners agreed to the course suggested bythe learned Standing Counsel for the respondents. Having regard tothe agreed stand taken by both the counsel, the writ petition isdisposed of with the following directions:
The 1[st] respondent shall treat the impugned order as shownotice to the petitioner, and the petitioners are directed to submit theirexplanation thereto within a period of four weeks from the date ofreceipt of a copy of this order, and upon the petitioners submitting theirexplanation, the 1[st] respondent shall consider the same and passappropriate orders thereon in accordance with law expeditiously. Tillsuch time, there shall be stay of recovery of amounts in pursuance ofthe impugned order, which is treated as show cause notice to thepetitioners.
Accordingly the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
Date: 30[th] December, 2008.KSR
_________________
N.V. RAMANA, J.