Telangana High Court
WP/33476/2010 of M/s. NRR Granites Pvt.Ltd., Rep. by its Managing Director, Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep.by its Secretary on 30 December 2010
SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.33476 of 2010 ORDER: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents. The petitioner herein had applied for grant of quarry lease for black granite
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.33476of2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedAssistant Government Pleader for Mines and Geology appearing forthe respondents.
The petitioner herein had applied for grant of quarry lease forblack granite in the land of an extent of 4.00 hectares covered bySurvey No.1518 of Badikayalapalli Village, B.Kothakota Mandal,Chittoor District. It is stated that the petitioner has paid requisite feestowards the application and also made necessary deposits. On theapplication of the petitioner, the third respondent -Assistant Director ofMines and Geology, Palamaner, Chittoor District, addressed a letter tothe fifth respondent - Tahsildar, B.Kothakota Mandal, for issuance ofno objection certificate after verifying the availability and classificationof the land for grant of quarry lease. It is the grievance of the petitionerthat pursuant to the said letter addressed by the third respondent, thefifth respondent is not sending report/no objection certificate directly tothe third respondent in terms of G.O.Ms.No.181, dated 28.05.1998.
When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learnedcounsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Mines and Geology appearing for the respondents that thesubject matter of the writ petition is covered by the order of this Court inW.P.No.23363 of 2010, dated 28.09.2010.
I have perused the order passed by the learned Single Judge ofthis Court in the said writ petition. Having regard to the fact that the issue, which arises for consideration in the present writ petition, iscovered by the above said order of this Court, this writ petition can alsobe disposed of following the said order.
In view of the directions issued by this Court in Writ PetitionNo.23363 of 2010, dated 28.09.2010, this writ petition is disposed ofdirecting the fifth respondent to send his report/recommendations inthe matter directly to the third respondent as envisaged inG.O.Ms.No.181, dated 28.05.1998, as expeditiously as possible. It ishowever made clear that whether the petitioner is entitled to quarrylease or not is a matter to be considered independently by therespondents. No order as to costs.
30[th] DECEMBER, 2010.kvni
_______________________
R.SUBHASH REDDY, J