Telangana High Court

CRLP/9008/2021 of Chhaya Marati Vs STATE OF TELANGANA on 31 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9008 OF 2021 ORDER:- This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail to the petitioner/sole accused in connection with Crime No. 112 of 2021 on the file of Prohibition & Excise

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMANCRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9008 OF 2021

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:-

This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking regular bail to the petitioner/sole accused in connection with Crime No. 112 of 2021 on the file of Prohibition & Excise Station, Khammam I-Town, wherein the petitioner is alleged to have committed the offence punishable under Section 8(c) r/w 20(b)(ii)(c) of NDPS Act.

2. The case of the prosecution is that on 03.11.2021 at about 07:15 a.m., on credible information, the Prohibition and Excise Inspector, Khammam-I, along with staff, conducted a route-watch and raids near the New Bus Stand area, Khammam and found the accused in possession of contraband weighing 11.5 kgs. kept in the polythene cover. The contraband was seized and the petitioner was sent to judicial custody.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the quantity of the contraband allegedly found in possession of the petitioner is less than commercial quantity and the petitioner is in judicial custody from 03.11.2021.

4. The learned Public Prosecutor, on the other hand, opposed the request of the petitioner for grant of bail.

5. The fact is that the petitioner is a resident of Madhya Pradesh State and she was found in possession of contraband which is ‘intermediate quantity’. In the circumstances, if the petitioner is enlarged on bail, there is every possibility of her non-availability for conducting further investigation as well as to proceed with the trial. Therefore, at this stage, this Court is not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail.

6. In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed.

______________

M. LAXMAN, J

Date :31.12.2021 tsr

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. LAXMAN

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 9008 OF 2021

DATE: 31-12-2021

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead