Telangana High Court
CC/2208/2015 of Smt. P. Sailaja, Vs Sri. K.Praveen Kumar, IAS, on 31 December 2015
SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY Contempt Case No.2208 of 2015 ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan) The order, violation of which is alleged in this contempt case, is the order passed by this Court in
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANAMURTHY
Contempt Case No.2208 of 2015
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Ramesh Ranganathan)
The order, violation of which is alleged in this contemptcase, is the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.35311 of2014 whereby the respondents herein were directed toconsider the case of the petitioner herein for promotion to thepost of Hostel Welfare Officer Grade –II, within six weeksfrom the date of receipt of a copy of the order, taking intoconsideration similar orders of exemption passed in respectof employees in the social welfare and tribal welfaredepartments, and the judgment of the Division Bench of thisCourt in W.P.No.5100 of 2014 dated 24.02.2014.
By proceedings dated 30.12.2015, the petitioner hereini.e Smt. P.Sailaja was promoted as Hostel Welfare OfficerGrade-II, and was posted at the Government B.C.GirlsHostel, Prathipadu. A copy of the proceedings has alsobeen marked to the petitioner herein.
It is clear, therefore, that the order, violation of which isalleged in this contempt case, has since been complied withalbeit belatedly. We do not, however, propose to take actionagainst the respondents herein for the delay, as the petitionerherein has since been promoted and the order of this Courthas been complied with.
The Contempt Case is, accordingly, closed. Themiscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also standclosed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________
RAMESH RANGANATHAN, J
Date:31.12.2015JSU
_____________________________
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANANDTHE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANAMURTHY
Contempt Case No.2208 of 2015
JSU
Date: 31.12.2015