Telangana High Court

CRP/1768/2014 of M/s. Roopa Informatics Limited., Vs Mr.Seshatalpa Sai on 30 December 2022

Cites 0, Cited by 0

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD t 3218I FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1768 OF 2014 Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, againsu aggrieved by

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO

PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY

CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1768 OF 2014

Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, againsu aggrieved bythe order dated 03/04/2014, in tA No.1337 of 2013 in os No.1774 of 20i3 the ilSenior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.

Between:

1 . M/s. . Roopa Informatics Limited, Represented by its Director SmI.K.L.V.S.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floor'in premises No.7-1-619/A/3Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floor'in premises No.7-1-619/A/3

[t1 Plo! trlo,48, ][[Gayathri ]][[Nagar, ]][[Ameerpet, ]][[Hyderabad.]]2. SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, D/o. Sri. Sunder Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ:

[[Gayathri ]][[Nagar, ]][[Ameerpet, ]][[Hyderabad.]]2. SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, D/o. Sri. Sunder Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ:Director of the Defendant No.1 Company R/o. 3gO, Anjan6ya Nagar,Kukatpally, Hyderabad....PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTSDirector of the Defendant No.1 Company R/o. 3gO, Anjan6ya Nagar,Kukatpally, Hyderabad....PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS

AND

Mr.Seshatalpa Sai, S/o. late Sri.M-Ram Mohan Rao, Aged about 77 years, Occ:-Retired Ensi neer, Rr/o. Prot No.48, Gayath ri Ertr^mX,TiFE+l+fS'fE#lo, *r, r.

CRPMP. NO:.2477 O2014

Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High couri may be pleased to suspend the effectand operation of the orders passed by the Hon'ble ll Senior civil Judge, city civilCourt, Hyderabad in l.A. No.1337 o'f 2O13 in O.S. No.1774 of 2013 dated03.o4.20't4.

CRPMP. NO:4595 oF 2014

Between:

M.Seshatalpa Sai,_S/o. late Sri.M.Ram Mohan Rao, Aged about 7g years, Occ:-Retired Engineer, Rl/o. Plot No.48, Gayathrinagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-sooo38....Petitioner/ RespondenURespondent

And

1. M/s. Roopa lnformatics Limited, Represented by its Director SmI.K.L.V.S.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floorin premises No.7-1-619/A"/3in Plot No.48, Gayathri Nagar. Ameerpet, Hyderabad.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floorin premises No.7-1-619/A"/3in Plot No.48, Gayathri Nagar. Ameerpet, Hyderabad.

2. Smt.K.L.V.S.Iakshmi, D/o. Sunder Rao, Aged aboLt 35i years, Occ:Business, PJo. i90, ,Anjaneya Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabarcl....RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONI:ttS/ PETITIONERS

Petition under riection ['15'1 ]CPC praying that in the circun-rstances stated inthe affidavit filed ther:with, the High Court may be pleased to \/acate the interimorder dt. 2510712014 n the above CRP.lMP.No. 2477 of 2Oi4 it CFlp.no. 1768 of2O14 by awarding exe rplary costs of Rs. 50,000/- in the interes t :rf justice For the Petitioners : liRl MILIND G GOKHALE, Advocate For the Respondent llo.1 : SRI G.DHANANJAI, Advocate The Court made the fo lowing: ORDER

THE HON'BLE SRI IIUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDYcryIL REVISION PETITIoN NO.17680F 2014

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Heard learned counsel on behalf of the revisionpetitioners. Perused the case status information. Onin structions it is submitted that the matter has becomeinfructuous. While recording the submissions, this CivilRevision petition is dismissed as infructuous. In thecircumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to thecosts. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall standsclosed.

Sd/-K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT REGISTRARGDSECTION OFFICER

/iTRUE COPY//

To1 . The ll Senior Civil Judoe? 9n" [.c; ]["s,.ituiiriliB.631'[";:1ff*fl ]SSBE| "o9. 9n" [cc ][to ][sric.onananJai, ]Ao;;;j;"folirbj' ["",]4. Two CD Copies Kj r I

I

II

HIGH COURTDATED:3011212022

ORDERCRP.No.1768 of 201,

DISMISED THE CRI [,AS ]INFRUCTUOUS.

(no0vlr;t,

i,!,II? i [ril ][i';l]i

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead