Telangana High Court
CRP/1768/2014 of M/s. Roopa Informatics Limited., Vs Mr.Seshatalpa Sai on 30 December 2022
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD t 3218I FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1768 OF 2014 Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, againsu aggrieved by
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD
FRIDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENTTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1768 OF 2014
Petition under Article 227 of the constitution of lndia, againsu aggrieved bythe order dated 03/04/2014, in tA No.1337 of 2013 in os No.1774 of 20i3 the ilSenior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.Senior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, at Hyderabad.
Between:
1 . M/s. . Roopa Informatics Limited, Represented by its Director SmI.K.L.V.S.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floor'in premises No.7-1-619/A/3Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floor'in premises No.7-1-619/A/3
[t1 Plo! trlo,48, ][[Gayathri ]][[Nagar, ]][[Ameerpet, ]][[Hyderabad.]]2. SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, D/o. Sri. Sunder Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ:
[[Gayathri ]][[Nagar, ]][[Ameerpet, ]][[Hyderabad.]]2. SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, SmI.K.L.V.S. Lakshmi, D/o. Sri. Sunder Rao, Aged about 35 years, Occ:Director of the Defendant No.1 Company R/o. 3gO, Anjan6ya Nagar,Kukatpally, Hyderabad....PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTSDirector of the Defendant No.1 Company R/o. 3gO, Anjan6ya Nagar,Kukatpally, Hyderabad....PETITIONERS/ RESPONDENTS/ DEFENDANTS
AND
Mr.Seshatalpa Sai, S/o. late Sri.M-Ram Mohan Rao, Aged about 77 years, Occ:-Retired Ensi neer, Rr/o. Prot No.48, Gayath ri Ertr^mX,TiFE+l+fS'fE#lo, *r, r.
CRPMP. NO:.2477 O2014
Petition under section 151 cPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High couri may be pleased to suspend the effectand operation of the orders passed by the Hon'ble ll Senior civil Judge, city civilCourt, Hyderabad in l.A. No.1337 o'f 2O13 in O.S. No.1774 of 2013 dated03.o4.20't4.
CRPMP. NO:4595 oF 2014
Between:
M.Seshatalpa Sai,_S/o. late Sri.M.Ram Mohan Rao, Aged about 7g years, Occ:-Retired Engineer, Rl/o. Plot No.48, Gayathrinagar, Ameerpet, Hyderabad-sooo38....Petitioner/ RespondenURespondent
And
1. M/s. Roopa lnformatics Limited, Represented by its Director SmI.K.L.V.S.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floorin premises No.7-1-619/A"/3in Plot No.48, Gayathri Nagar. Ameerpet, Hyderabad.Lakshmi D/o. Sundar Rao, Office at Ground Floorin premises No.7-1-619/A"/3in Plot No.48, Gayathri Nagar. Ameerpet, Hyderabad.
2. Smt.K.L.V.S.Iakshmi, D/o. Sunder Rao, Aged aboLt 35i years, Occ:Business, PJo. i90, ,Anjaneya Nagar, Kukatpally, Hyderabarcl....RESPONDENTS/ PETITIONI:ttS/ PETITIONERS
Petition under riection ['15'1 ]CPC praying that in the circun-rstances stated inthe affidavit filed ther:with, the High Court may be pleased to \/acate the interimorder dt. 2510712014 n the above CRP.lMP.No. 2477 of 2Oi4 it CFlp.no. 1768 of2O14 by awarding exe rplary costs of Rs. 50,000/- in the interes t :rf justice For the Petitioners : liRl MILIND G GOKHALE, Advocate For the Respondent llo.1 : SRI G.DHANANJAI, Advocate The Court made the fo lowing: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI IIUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDYcryIL REVISION PETITIoN NO.17680F 2014
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel on behalf of the revisionpetitioners. Perused the case status information. Onin structions it is submitted that the matter has becomeinfructuous. While recording the submissions, this CivilRevision petition is dismissed as infructuous. In thecircumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to thecosts. Miscellaneous applications, if any pending, shall standsclosed.
Sd/-K.VENKAIAHASSISTANT REGISTRARGDSECTION OFFICER
/iTRUE COPY//
To1 . The ll Senior Civil Judoe? 9n" [.c; ]["s,.ituiiriliB.631'[";:1ff*fl ]SSBE| "o9. 9n" [cc ][to ][sric.onananJai, ]Ao;;;j;"folirbj' ["",]4. Two CD Copies Kj r I
I
II
HIGH COURTDATED:3011212022
ORDERCRP.No.1768 of 201,
DISMISED THE CRI [,AS ]INFRUCTUOUS.
(no0vlr;t,
i,!,II? i [ril ][i';l]i