Telangana High Court
WP/28619/2008 of Sri Survi Sivaprasad Vs The Revenue Divisional Officer, on 29 December 2008
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU WRIT PETITION NO : 28619 of 2008 Between: Sri Survi Sivaprasad S/o. Survi Mallesha R/o. Tule Kalan
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
MONDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.RAMULUWRIT PETITION NO : 28619 of 2008
Between:
Sri Survi Sivaprasad S/o. Survi Mallesha R/o. Tule Kalan Ibrahimpatnam Mandal, R.R.District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
The Revenue Divisional Officer,
East Division, R.R.District at Goshamahal, Malakunta Road,Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to to issue a writ order or direction more particularlyone in the nature of Writ of Mandamus ro declare the action of therespondent for non-taking any action or giving any directing on theapplication filed by the petitioner dt. 16.09.2008 till today andconsequently directing the respondents to issue the ration in favour ofthe petitioenr by way of giving temporary authorisation and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.V.SATYA PRASAD
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR CIVIL SUPPLIES
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.28619 of 2008
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORAL ORDER:
It appears, petitioner’s grand father Survi Kistaiah was the fair price shop dealer of Tule Kalan village, Ibrahimpatnam mandal, RangaReddy district and he had valid authorization upto 31.3.2008.Unfortunately, he died on 6.9.2008. The grievance of the petitioner isthat his father is crippled and unhealthy, therefore being grandson andlooking after the entire family, he applied for allotment of the fair priceshop in his favour. In this regard, he also made a representation to therespondent on 16.9.2008 seeking to consider his request for allotmentof fair price shop held by his grand father in his name. According to thelearned counsel for petitioner, the said application is not acted uponand in the meanwhile, the said fair price shop is allotted to a third partyas a temporary measure.
Under those circumstances, without going into merits, the solerespondent is directed to consider the representation made by thepetitioner on 16.9.2008 and pass appropriate orders, as per law, for thepurpose of considering allotment of fair price shop in favour ofpetitioner, which was held by his grand father, as per the circulars inforce as of now. This exercise shall be done within a period of fourweeks from the date of receipt of this order.
The writ petition is accordingly disposed of. No order as tocosts.
Date: 29.12.2008DA
_____________
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.RAMULU
W.P.No.28619 of 2008
29.12.2008