Telangana High Court
WP/27556/2005 of Suri Rammohan Goud, Vs Managing Director, APSRTC, on 27 December 2005
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY W.P.No.27556 of 2005 Date:27.12.2005 Suri Rammohan Goud. --------PETITIONER Managing Director and another. ---------RESPONDENTS ORDER: The petitioner, who was employed as a Driver in the APSRTC, was retired on medical grounds, through order, dated
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
W.P.No.27556 of 2005
Date:27.12.2005
Suri Rammohan Goud.
Managing Director and another.
--------PETITIONER
---------RESPONDENTS
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner, who was employed as a Driver in the APSRTC, was retired onmedical grounds, through order, dated 20.10.2005. The petitioner states that therespondents are under obligation to provide him alternative appointment interms of Section 47 of the Persons With Disabilities (equal opportunities,protection of rights and full participation) Act, 1995 (for short ‘the Act’) as wellas the Circulars issued by the Corporation. He states that the respondentshave not taken any steps for implementation of the same.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counselfor the respondents.
It is true that the Corporation framed certain schemes, for the purpose ofproviding rehabilitation or employment, as the case may be, to the drivers, whoare retired on medical grounds. The liability under the Act is another aspect ofthe matter, which needs to be considered. The record does not disclose thatthe petitioner has made any representation in this regard.
Hence, the Writ Petition is disposed of, leaving it open to the petitioner to submit a representation to the respondents, seeking necessary relief. As andwhen such a representation is made, the respondent shall pass appropriateorders thereon, within a period of three (3) months from the date of presentationof the same. There shall be no order as to costs.
Jsu
_________
27.12.2005