Telangana High Court

WP/16838/2005 of Rajesh Pandey Vs The Collector and District Malgistrate on 27 December 2005

Cites 0, Cited by 0

SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH WRIT PETITION No.16838 OF 2005 Dated: 27-12-2005 Between Rajesh Pandey, S/o. Sri Ramchandra Pandey Occ: Security Guard, R/o. Plot No.56, Ambedkar Nagar, Uppal, R.R. District. …PETITIONER AND The Collector and District Magistrate Ranga Reddy District,

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE V. ESWARAIAH

WRIT PETITION No.16838 OF 2005

Dated: 27-12-2005

Between

Rajesh Pandey, S/o. Sri Ramchandra Pandey Occ: Security Guard, R/o. Plot No.56, Ambedkar Nagar, Uppal, R.R. District.

…PETITIONER

AND

The Collector and District Magistrate

Ranga Reddy District, Lakdi-ka-pool

Hyderabad.

…RESPONDENT

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

Petitioner seeks a Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the respondent in not issuinggun licence as illegal and arbitrary.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has an Arms licence issued bythe office of the Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, Bihar District vide licence No.25/1999and he purchased a 12 Bore SBBL gun bearing No.1119 from Indian Arms Corporation. Learned counsel further submits that the petitioner shifted his residence from Bihar to Andhra Pradesh; residing atPlot No.56, Ambedkar Nagar, Uppal, Ranga Reddy district and sought for re-registration of the licence in the office of the respondent.

The Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, vide his letter dated 23.03.1999 issued no objectioncertificate for re-registration of the gun in any other State. The gun licence issued by theGovernment of Bihar is for all India and the petitioner need to re-register the same in theState of AP, due to change of residence. The petitioner made a representation on04.10.2002 requesting the respondent to re-register his gun licence but the Superintendentin the respondent office having received the same did not take any action. The learnedcounsel for the petitioner further submits that unless the gun licence is re-registered thepetitioner cannot make use of the gun and cannot procure an Armed Escort Duty, whichfetches him a sum of Rs.4,000/- per month but now he is only a security guard and earningRs.2,000/- per month.

Without expressing any opinion as the representation of the petitioner is pending before therespondent there cannot be any justification for not disposing the said representation.Petitioner has filed a copy of the representation dated 04.10.2002 requesting to re-register his arms licence No.25 of 1999 valid up to 31.07.2003 covered by one 12 BoreSBBL Gun No.1119 valid for all India issued by Deputy Commissioner, Palamau, Biharaccompanied by original arms licence, two photographs and address proof.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, the respondent is directed to consider and dispose the representation of the petitioner dated04.10.2002, if not already disposed of, in accordance with law after giving reasonableopportunity to the petitioner.

The writ petition is accordingly disposed of.

______________V. ESWARAIAH, J

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead