Telangana High Court
WP/24045/2004 of B.S. Mallesh S/o B. Sathaiah Vs The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, on 30 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY and THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO : 24045 of 2004 Between: B.S. Mallesh S/o B.
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE G. BIKSHAPATHY
and
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION NO : 24045 of 2004
Between:
B.S. Mallesh S/o B. Sathaiah
Aged about 35 years,R/o Medchal, Secunderabad
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Hyderabad NorthSub-Sub- Division, General Post Office, Abids, Hyderabad 2 The Senior Supdt. of Post Offices, Hyderabad City Division, GPO
Abids, Hyderabad
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtwill be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, especially, one inthe nature of Writ of Certiorari calling for the records, the orderspassed by Cntral Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad Bench,Hyderabad in O. A. No. 998/2001 dt 17-7-2001 and to quash thesame, consequently directing the respondents to keep the petitioner's name in the waiting list as per the instructions in DGP&Tletter NO. 43-4/77/PEN dt 23-2-1979 and provide alternateappointment as per his turn.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.CH.RAVINDER
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2: MR.A.RAJASHEKAR
REDDY (SC FOR CG)
The Court made the following :
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Mr.Justice G.Bikshapathy)
The Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the CentralAdministrative Tribunal, Hyderabad in O.A.No.998/2001 dated 17-7-2001.
2. The petitioner filed the O.A. seeking regularization of his service as Extra Departmental Delivery Agent. The said O.A. was dismissedwith the following observations:
“No rules are shown to us in support of this contention. Aprovisionally appointed Extra Departmental Delivery Agent isonly entitled for placing his name in the waiting list if he hadworked for more than 3 years but no right accrues in him forabsorption.”
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner now submits that thepetitioner’s name may be placed in the waiting list since he hasworked for more than three years and at this stage he is notinterested in seeking regularization of his service.
4. In view of the submission, we dispose of the Writ Petition with adirection that if the petitioner fulfils the conditions for placing him in thewaiting list in accordance with the Posts and Telegraphs Extra-Departmental Agents (Conduct and Service) Rules, 1964, theauthorities are directed to consider the same and pass appropriateorders. No order as to costs.
____________________
Justice G.Bikshapathy
____________________
Justice P.S.NarayanaDate : 30-12-2004
AM
ASSISTANT REGISTRAR
To
1 The Assistant Superintendent of Post Offices, Hyderabad NorthSub- Division, General Post Office, Abids, Hyderabad 2 The Senior Supdt. of Post Offices, Hyderabad City Division, GPO
Abids, Hyderabad
3. 2CD copies