Telangana High Court

CC/1760/2019 of Smt. Pushpa Govind Shah Vs Sri V. Yaswanth on 31 December 2020

COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD THURSDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1760 OF 2019 contempt case filed under sections 10 lo 12 of contempt of courts Act to punish the respondents

THURSDAY, THE THIRTY [FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEIVBER]TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE [SHAMEEM AKTHER]

CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1760 [OF 2019]

contempt case filed under sections [10 ][lo ][12 ][of ][contempt ][of ][courts Act ][to]punish the respondents herein for wilful disobedience [and ][deliberate violation ][of ][the]Orders of the High Court [dated ][O210112019 ][in ][WP ][No.48008 ][of 2018.]

Between:

1. Smt. Pushpa Govind [Shah, ][W/o ][Govind ][V. ][Shah, ][Aged ][60 ][years, occ']Housewife, RJo H.No. [4-3-164, Hanuman Tekdi, ][Hyderabad ].Housewife, RJo H.No. [4-3-164, Hanuman Tekdi, ][Hyderabad ].Z smi, Swarupa Devi [tr/undhada, ][W/o ][Muraridas Mundhada, ][Age-d ][55 ][yearl' ][Occ']Housewife, R/o H.No. [15-7-317, ][Braj ][Basanth ][Sri ][Gopinath Complex, ][Begum]Bazar' Hvderabad ...pETrroNERSi [pETlrloNERS]Housewife, R/o H.No. [15-7-317, ][Braj ][Basanth ][Sri ][Gopinath Complex, ][Begum]Bazar' Hvderabad ...pETrroNERSi [pETlrloNERS]

AND

Sri V.Yaswanth. The Tahsildar, [Kandukur ][tr,4andal, ][Ranga ][Reddy ][District']

...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT [NO'4]

Counsel for the Petitioners [: SRl. GADE ][VENKATESWARA ][RAO]

Counsel for the Respondent [: GP FOR ][REVENUE]

The Court made the following: [ORDER]

To

THE HON'BLE DT. JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER

CONTEMPT CASE No.175O of 2019

ORDER

Page 1 of 2

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and perusedthe record.the record.

It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learnedcounsel for the petitioners that the respondent has complied theorder, dated 02.07.2019, passed by this Court in W.p.No.4B0OBof 2018, alleging non-compliance of which, this contempt case isfiled and that no orders are required to be passed in thiscontempt case.

Recording the said submission of the learned counsel forthe petitioner, this contempt case is closed. No costs.the petitioner, this contempt case is closed. No costs.

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this ContemptCase, shall stand closed, Sd/-C V.MALLIKARJUNA VARIVADEPUTY REGI TRAR//TRUE COPY'/ivSECTION OFFICER

1. Sri VYaswanth, The Tahsildar, Kanglukur Mandal, Ranga Reddy District2.9n" 99 [to Sri Gade Venkateswara ][nao, ]nJ"oJai"'fOpUCt3.Two CCs to Gp for Revenue, Higl", coG fo;il; sir't;'oi i6langana, atHyderabad (OUT)4.Two CD CopiesKj,rlvHyderabad (OUT)4.Two CD CopiesKj,rlv DATED:3111212020

ORDERCC.No.1760 of 2019

CLOSING THE C.C.

\\2:4)Y

HE [SIA]r6-qJo,J12 JAil202lJl, 4e.SP,,:r', C\:

Page 2 of 2

Loading citations and judicial treatment…

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead