Telangana High Court
WP/19217/1999 of S.R.BHASKAR REDDY CUDDAPAH Vs DIST COOP OFFICER CUDDAPAHAND3ORS on 26 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO : 19217 of 1999 Between: S.r.Bhaskar Reddy, S/o R.Venkata Subba Reddy, aged 27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION NO : 19217 of 1999
Between:
S.r.Bhaskar Reddy, S/o R.Venkata Subba Reddy, aged 27 years,H.No.3-1126, Y.M.R.Colony, Proddatur, Cuddapah District.
.....PETITIONER
AND
1. The District Cooperative Officer, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District.
2. Divisional Cooperative Officer, Proddatur, Cuddapah District.3. Coop Sub Registrar/Person-in-charge, Proddatur CentralConsumers’ Cooperative Stores Ltd., R 281, Proddatur,Cuddapah District.3. Coop Sub Registrar/Person-in-charge, Proddatur CentralConsumers’ Cooperative Stores Ltd., R 281, Proddatur,Cuddapah District.
4. The Proddatur Central Coop Consumers Cooperative StoresLtd No. R 281, 4/215, Super Bazaar Road, Proddatur 516 360Cuddapah District represented by its Managing Director.Ltd No. R 281, 4/215, Super Bazaar Road, Proddatur 516 360Cuddapah District represented by its Managing Director.
.....RESPONDENTS
Counsel for the Petitioner : None.
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“It is therefore prayed that this Honourable Court maybe pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction moreparticularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring thatthe impugned orders in proceedings No.Nil, dated 31.8.99 ofthe 4[th] respondent herein i.e. the Managing Director of theProddatur Central Consumers Cooperative Stores Ltd.,No.R 281 – Super Bazaar, Proddatur, Cuddapah Districtissued pursuant to the directions in memo No.Nil dt.20.8.99and the endorsement dt.31.8.99 of the 3[rd] respondent herein
i.e., Cooperative Sub Registrar/Person-in-charge of the said stores, at the behest of the 1[st] respondent herein (i.e. DistrictCooperative Officer, Cuddapah, Cuddapah District, throughmemo Rc No.4962/95E dt.30.7.99, as violative of Sec 47(1)of the A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988, besideshitting Articles 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India as alsocontrary to the cardinal principles of natural justice andhence set aside.”
When the writ petition was taken up for hearing on 24.12.2008,no one appeared for the petitioner. Therefore, it was adjourned totoday. Even today, when the case is posted under the caption ‘forDismissal’, no one appeared for the petitioner. It is, therefore,reasonable to presume that the petitioner is not interested in pursuinghis cause in the writ petition.
The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed in default.
As a sequel to dismissal of main petition in default,WPMP.No.24057 of 1999 filed by the petitioner for interim relief isdisposed of as infructuous.
________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
Dated:26.12.2008GJ