Telangana High Court
CC/1725/2010 of D. Gopikrishna, Vs MR. CHANGALRAYUDU on 31 December 2010
C.V. RAMULU C.C.Nos. 1724 and 1725 of 2010 Date: 31-12-2010 C.C.No.1724 of 2010: Between: Smt. P. Santha Kumari ……….. Petitioner and Mr. A . Chengalrayudu, The Joint Sub-Registrar-I, Office of the Registrar, Sri Balaji Regn. District, Tirupati, Chittoor District, and
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
C.C.Nos. 1724 and 1725 of 2010
Date: 31-12-2010
C.C.No.1724 of 2010:
Between:
Smt. P. Santha Kumari
and
Mr. A. Chengalrayudu, The Joint Sub-Registrar-I,Office of the Registrar, Sri Balaji Regn. District,Tirupati, Chittoor District, and others.
……….. Petitioner
………. Respondents
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. RAMULU
C.C.Nos. 1724 and 1725 of 2010
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
COMMON ORDER:
The learned counsel for the petitioners represents that theorders of this Court have been complied with and therefore, thecontempt cases may be closed.
Recording the submission of the learned counsel, the contemptcases are closed.
Date: 31-12-2010YCR
_____________
C.V. RAMULU, J