Telangana High Court

WP/45352/2017 of G HARISH KUMAR Vs STATE OF TELANGANA on 30 December 2021

Cites 0, Cited by 0

11"$il'^i: l:::-" ^-^ tsP"til'oJisi;i iurisdiction) rHURsox, rur rHtsJ ilB',$"'siisRE*"* THE HONOURABLE DR RIT TITI N NO PRESENT JUSTICE SHAMEEM AKTHER 5 5 F2 17 Between: Occ -Business, Rlo 22'8-48 ' 3-I*l:n":w,*'rl;JT[,,11?"1"f,?31#:+l'*vears'occ

I

H|GH [couRr'?T ]11"$il'^i: l:::-" [^-^]

tsP"til'oJisi;i [iurisdiction)]

rHURsox, [rur ][rHtsJ ]ilB',$"'siisRE*"*

PRESENTJUSTICE [SHAMEEM AKTHER]

THE [HONOURABLE DR]

RITTITIN NO5 5F2[17]

Between: Occ -Business, [Rlo ][22'8-48 ][']3-I*l:n":w,*'rl;JT[,,11?"1"f,?31#:+l'*vears'occ.,.PETITIONER

.,.PETITIONER

AND

X?'i:"J":l"H':llL"f :ffi [8Bf ]iilif "%::iilSfl ,:'""::::-;:J'2f; ,tT:ilys'"",3'";:HxTio,?:ff [i1"'i'iii?"tg:I5'!"''ii--]3The [Vice Chairman ][f'f ][ut""yu ][U'Uun ][nurnority' Warangal' Warangal District]4lff tiil [Tl?ItUl ][i,l';,',':"i*l'%?i'i:SlL?'"ffi ][3:"'t'?'""';#i'$"'[?.;Ji"]District.B usiness' [R/o ][H]5R::l[:[,,.o?': [gll,i'(?':?3i''i":ft%i:"?:?iifJ' ][t?3"'dicc- ]...RESPONDENTS

p et t o n u n d e r [A ]1r " " ;3?,?J,1,:: iii"Iliifi *:,,ls#ffi1,*"i'*,i:"1;J::S"JT"1:';11':?J:,'::5Xx;; [;;; ][;articurarrv ][one ][it ]No 2 and [3 ][in ][not]flriini'l.1;ti:ft -x.a**;:[ix:i:1il:i:3i1"*Hii;;lt'*r*'22-11-2017 [made against ][tne ][illeoal and unauthorized ]oPen [p]91 ][cons'][a'lmeasuring ][51822 ][sq]the Respondents [No4 ][and ]" [i""p'"tittt"* ]"19 vards in sy [No. ][24. ][.,,rrr"i ][tli ]['v"odepally ][Revenue, ][villaqe' ][Hanamkonda'](.ruaransar. waransar o,.1,11 'lT' lll31.,,',"^li,ir,l']l l;:i X[[::: ;i',ll"r&l'^Tl U;l:1ff":'"ll:m [i::'i3"::l'['i'l",iii:j:;;Jno""iNo ][2 ][and ][3 ][to ][cance']in" in S. [and ][burlding oermission accorded ][to ][them']

lA NO: I [OF 2018]

PetitionUnderSectionl5lCPCprayingthat^inthecircUmstancesstatedinmav be [pleased ][to ][vacate]the affidavit i;; ili;il;r.der [filed in support ][J,tuo ]'o oz 't zor e [in" ]in [#tiitl' ]wP No [16" ]45352t2017 [1 ][o1 ]^c^o.'1't '

IANO:2O[F 2017]

Petition [under ][Section ][151 CPC praying ][that ][ln ][the ][circumstances stated ][in]the affidavit [filed ][in support ]t"n" i"tui"^' [itte ][High ][Court mav be pleased ][to ][direct]"t 4, and 5 from [making ][illegal]the Respondents [No ][2 ][and ][s ][io"'[op ][ih" ]'"tpon"dents and unauthorized [construction ][i" ][p"jiii""Lrt ][open land ][plot ][admeasuring ][518 ][22 ][sq]vards in [Sy ][No. ][24, ][situateJ'at ][VadOepalty ][Revenue ][village' ][Hanamkonda']iili."#,, [-rniu*'isrt ]oi"tri"t, [pending disposal ][of the ][above ][Writ ][peliti1n']

Counsel for 1e petitioner: Il'v'o,RGA NAGE.*ARA counser counser for for r tr re e Respondent Respondent No'1 : GP FoR M.PL A.MN RAoAND ,RBAN oEVcounser for, -. Respondent ' ''""'"''nALr [LAK'HMT, ]sc FoR GWM.,'o'' : counser for th r Rs5pen6.r, fo't .R,'AJAY K,MAR MADrsc FoR K,DArhe court mac : *re "-''"';;;;"i: JI, rorrowing::;;'

\

THE [HON'BLE ][DT.][ ]USTI][CE ][SHAMEEM AKTHER]

P

..^der Article [226 ][of ][the ][constitution ][of]

oRDER:

wherein [the ][rorrowine ][praver ][is],",'. ]::',::' [Jlt"";"-';"" ]

,. --lt^. more [parricularlY ][lne ][in ][the]****,gfi*H$$ffi:l?'1,i11"i. ["'; ][I ]n i'i ';:" !!i: {]"i :" iii^,'$ [:iT ][i{T ][:Iif ]?l"iiii".,,, [o' ][*" ][*!"'".'.".""?!El',1",i"'.'""i0'i" ][-0"" ][such ][other]ind [burlding ][oermissto]"# order [or ][orderS]

made:

2. [Hearo ][the ][learned ][Government ][Pieader ][for ][Municipal]Administration [and ][Urban Development appearing ][for ][respondent]No.1, [learned ][Standing Counsel ][for ][GWMC ][appearing ][for]respondent [No.2, learned Standing ][Counsel ][for ][KUDA ][appearing ][for]respondent [No.3 and perused ][the ][record']

There is [no ][representation ][for the ][petitioner and ][respondent]3, Nos.4 and [5.]

4,Learned Standing [Counsel ][for ][GWlvlc, ][on ][written ][instructions']would submit [that the ][respondent-Corporation' ][after ][due]verification, [granted building ][permission ][to ][unofficial ][respondent]No.4 for construction [of ][G+1 ][(Residential ][Building) ][in ][the ][subject]property vide [permission ][No'3006/4079l ][w54/2017 ]' [dated]02.06.20L7, and [the ][construction ][was ][completed ][within the ][time]stipu lated.

I

5. Tt s Writ petition \is nr^, -,, :H":il ;"'-':: [\]*J:U"ffi:;T"J''::: to the petitioner It is stat rd by the ,uurn'ttoto'n' €d standing counsel for GwMc belongs to him.responder that thet-corporation due verification' granted permissiol buildingin favour the u respondent No.4 For constructionof G+1 ( :esidential ur,,,nott't'u' ling) in the subject properry and theconstructio I was complete d within the time stipuiated. If there isany dispuk with regard to the ti e of the subject properry, thepetitioner las an eFfective and efficacious remedy before aCOmpetent rivil Court. it is settied law that if, in a petition filedunder Articz 226 of the Constitution of India, complicatedquestions offact which require a regular and full-fledged trial areinvolved, it i; but prudent that the Court should refrain itself fromentertainingsuch petition and relegate the party to the normalremedy toobtain redressal in a Suit. Since, the unofficialrespondent Ilos.4 and 5 have raised structures over the subjectproperty witldue permission from the respondent-Corporation andthe constru(tion made is in accordance with the permissiongranted, the'elief sought for in the present Writ Petition cannot begranted.

6. Accordrgly, the Writ Petition is dismissed.

N4 isce llneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand crsed. There shall be no order as to costs.

SO/,.V.KAVITHAASSISTANT TIEGISTRAR

,TRUE COPY//

SE,STICIN OFFICER

To1. TWO CCS tO 3P FOR IVICPL ADIVN AND [URBAN ][DEVELOPNIENT, High ][COUTT]forthe State rf Telangana at Hyderabad. [OUT]

2. One CC to S iI.V.DURGA NAGESWARA RAO, [Advocate ]IOPUC]

(*.F-*--

lqffi Eg\3it1t'tr4"#{{#Hri"{'iiii[{l"fl'^1t"""'7. One [spare ][coPY]SAq L

HIGH COU RT

DATED:3O/ 2t2021

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER

WP.No.453 i2 of 2017

DISMISSING'I HE W.PWITHOUT COIiTS.

r-n@t't'")taWb,9----"

1 [E ][Sr4]Itl((.:o?1 Mlil [2fi22]j'

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead