Telangana High Court
WP/23634/2004 of Smt.Ghanta Venkataramana, Vs Station House officer, on 29 December 2004
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU WRIT PETITION NO : 23634 of 2004 Between: Smt.Ghanta
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY NINTH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE BILAL NAZKI
and THE HON'BLE DR JUSTICE G.YETHIRAJULU
WRIT PETITION NO : 23634 of 2004
Between:
Smt.Ghanta Venkataramana, W/o.Gopal,R/o.Dadanagarpeta, Kagazhnagar, Adilabad District.
AND
..... PETITIONER
1 The Station House officer, Central Crime Station, Khammam.
2 The Superintendent of police, Khammam.
3 Inspector of police, Kagazhnagar, Adilabad Dist.
4 State of A.P.rep.by the Principal Secretary, Department of Home Secretariat, Hyderabad.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court may be pleased toissue an order, direction or writ more particularly in the nature of writ of HabeasCorpus declaring that the action of the respondents in detaining in their custody thefollowing persons, namely Ghanta Ramu S/o.Gopal aged 33 yrs, GhantaMallikarjuna S/o.Gopal aged about 22 years, and Pala Satyanarayana S/o. (Late)Venkataswamy, aged about 23 years, all resident of Kagazhnagar, for the periodfrom 23/10/2004 till date is arbitrary, unlawful and unconstitutional, and furtherdirecting the respondents to forthwith produce the said detenus before this Hon'blecourt and set them at liberty, and pass such other order or orders.
Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.K.BALAGOPAL
Counsel for the Respondents.: THE ADVOCATE GENERAL
The Court at the admission stage made the following :
Order:(per BN,J)
In response to the allegations of illegal detention, the respondents have filed acounter stating that the detenus were arrested in connection with crime No.130 of2004 on 22.12.2004. Counsel for the petitioner however insists that the detenuswere arrested on 23.10.2004. In any case, as on today, the detenus are in judicialcustody. Therefore, no further orders are necessary to be passed in this writ petition.The alleged detenus are at liberty to seek appropriate remedy from appropriateCourt. They are also at liberty to agitate the grievance relating to their actual date ofarrest.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed.
(BILAL NAZKI,J)
DATED 29..12..2004
(Dr.G.YETHIRAJULU,J)
msv
To
1 The Station House officer, Central Crime Station, Khammam.
2 The Superintendent of police, Khammam.
3 The Inspector of police, Kagazhnagar, Adilabad Dist.
4 The Principal Secretary, State of A.P. Home Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
5. 2 CCs to the Advocate General, High Court of A.P. Hyderabad.
6. 2 CD copies