CCCA/225/2006 of Mohd. Faizuddin Vs K. Satyanarayana Reddy on 31 December 2024

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAD

TUESDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FOUR

PRESENT

THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILIANDTHE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTY

ctry ctvtL COURT APPEALNO: 225OF2006

Appeal filed under Section 96 of CpC aggrieved by the Judgment andDecree dated 08.09.2006 passed in o.S.No.518 of 2oo1 on the file of the court ofthe X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.the X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.

Between:

Mohd. Faizuddin, S/o Mohd. Abdul kareem, Occ: Business, R/o 17-.1_304/4 EdiBazar Hyderabad.Bazar Hyderabad.

...AppellanUPltf.

AND

1. [.^S,g!alar.ayana Reddy, S/o Tirupathi Reddy, Occ Business, RIo 6-1_1 03/99, Padmaraonagai Hyderabdd.1 03/99, Padmaraonagai Hyderabdd.

2. K. Tirupathi !e.{dy, S/9 tate K. Sai Reddy, Occ: Business, R/o 18-1-259,Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.

3 5 S?t nelOy, S-/o late.K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business R/o 18_1-259,Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.

4. K Shankar Reddy, S/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business R/o [.,l8_1_259,]Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.

5. K.^Raja Narasimha Reddy, s/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, occ: Business R/o 1B-'l-259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.'l-259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.

6. [.Pandurang1Red9.y, S/o late K. Tirupathi Reddy, Occ: Business Flro [.tB_1_]259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.259, Kandikal Gate Hyderabad.

...Respondents/Defts

t.A. NO: 1 0F 2006(CCCAM P. NO: 6't3 OF 2006

Petition under order-39 Rure-1 & 2, Rrw. Section 151 cpc praying that inthe circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the Highcourt may be preased to grant an as interim injunction restraining theresponiients, their men, agents, person of persons claiming under them fromalienating or dearing in any manner with the schedure of property and arsointerfering with the petitioner's peaceful possession and enjoyment in respect ifthe schedule of property in os No. 519/01 on the file of the court of the X Addl.Cheif Judge, CCC, Hyderabad.

Counsel forthe Appellant : Sri. G K Deshpande (Not present)Counsel for the Respondent No. 3 : Sri Vinaykanth ReddyCounsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 6 : None AppearedThe Court delivered the following:The Court delivered the following:

II

\

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI

AND

THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE LAXMI NARAYANA ALISHETTYC.C.C.A.No .225 oF 2006

JUDGMENT i (per the Hon'bte Si Justice Abhin(md Kumar Shauiti)

None appeared for the appellant, though theappeal is listed today under the caption ,for dismissal,.Hence, this Court has no other option, except todismiss the case for default and also for non_prosecution

2. Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed for defaultas well as for non-prosecution. No costs.

3. As a sequel, miscellaleous applications pendingif any in this appeal, shall stand closed.

Sd/. M. RAMANA KRISHNADEPUTY REGISTRAR

//TRUE COPY//

I

CTION OFFICER

To,

1. The X Additional Chief Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad. (Withrecords )2. One CC to Sri. G K Deshpande, Advocate [OPUC]3. One CC to Sri Vinaykanth Reddy, Advocate IOPUCI4. Two CD CopiesDL/dh@_*, HIGH COURT

DATED:31 11212024

5rA'61$8,k\c)t1 0TItti12n25i.)It oEpA-r