Telangana High Court
WP/17596/1999 of D. Kumara Swamy Vs The Girijan Co-operative Corporation Ltd., on 24 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER, TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY PRESENT: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.17596 of 1999 Between: D. Kumara Swamy … Petitioner AND The
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE,ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF DECEMBER,TWO THOUSAND EIGHT ONLY
PRESENT:
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.17596 of 1999
Between:
D. Kumara Swamy
… Petitioner
AND
The Girijan Cooperative Corporation Ltd.,Rep., by its Vice Chairman & Managing Director,Chinna Waltair, Visakhapatnam & others.
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner : Sri Y. Rama Rao This Court made the following:
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDYWRIT PETITION No.17596 of 1999
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:-
This writ petition is filed for a Writ of Mandamus to setaside order dated 01.08.1997, whereby the petitioner was keptunder suspension.
Heard Sri Y. Rama Rao, learned counsel for the petitionerand perused the record.
A perusal of the proceeding sheet shows that thedisciplinary proceedings have not been stayed by this Courtpending the writ petition. The learned counsel for the petitioner isunable to report on the present stage of the disciplinaryproceedings. However, in the absence of stay of the disciplinaryproceedings, it is reasonable to presume that the disciplinaryproceedings would have got concluded by this time, as more thannine years elapsed from the initiation of the said proceedings.
In view of the same, the cause in the writ petition does notsurvive for consideration and the writ petition is accordinglydismissed as infructuous.
____________________________
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J