Telangana High Court
CC/1501/2011 of M. Panduranga Chary Vs Ulli Lingaiah on 29 December 2011
SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY CONTEMPT CASE No.1501 of 2011 ORDER: The petitioner herein filed S.A.No.1028 of 2007 feeling aggrieved by the judgment in A.S.No.19 of 2004 on the file of the VI Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Mahaboobnagar. The second appeal was admitted and in
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE L.NARASIMHA REDDY
CONTEMPT CASE No.1501 of 2011
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The petitioner herein filed S.A.No.1028 of 2007 feelingaggrieved by the judgment in A.S.No.19 of 2004 on the file of theVI Additional District Judge (F.T.C.), Mahaboobnagar. The secondappeal was admitted and in S.A.M.P.No.2262 of 2007, an interimorder was passed on 05.09.2007 directing the respondents hereinnot to change the nature of the land.
This contempt case is filed alleging that the respondentsare changing the land and cutting the trees that were existing overit.
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learnedcounsel for the respondents.
The order of this Court restrained the respondents fromaltering the land in any manner. The cause of action for thepetitioners to file this contempt case is that the respondents havecut some trees.
It is stated by the respondents that out of several hundredsof trees that are existing upon the schedule property, two treeshave withered away and they have been cut to ensure that thetrees do not fall on their own accord and cause damage to theremaining trees. They also undertake not to cut any further trees or to alter the land in any manner, much less to alienate it.
The contempt case is closed recording the undertakinggiven on behalf of the respondents. There shall be no order as tocosts.
Dt:29.12.2011.
_____________________
L.NARASIMHA REDDY,J
kdl