Telangana High Court
WP/35864/2012 of Reddi Ravanamma, W/o. Mallu Naidu, Vs The Superintending engineer, on 31 December 2012
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.35864 of 2012 Date: 31.12.2012 Between: 1. Reddi Ravanamma and 15 others. ..... Petitioners And: 1. The Superintending Engineer, Roads and Buildings, Srikakulam District And three others. .....Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Mamidi Rama Rao
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
WRIT PETITION No.35864 of 2012
Between:
Date: 31.12.2012
1. Reddi Ravanamma and 15 others.
And:
..... Petitioners
1. The Superintending Engineer,Roads and Buildings, Srikakulam DistrictAnd three others.
.....Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri Mamidi Rama Rao Counsel for the Respondents: GP for Roads and BuildingsCounsel for Respondent Nos.2 and 4: GP for Irrigation andCAD
The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus todeclare the action of the respondents in trying toencroach upon and dispossess the petitioners from theirhouses/vacant house sites bearing D.Nos.1-141, 5-41,1-131, 2-391/A, 1-42, 1-04, 1-38, 1-66, 1-145, 1-28, 2-36, 2-24, 1-31, 2-31, 2-420 and 1-21 abutting theexisting main road in Vunukuru Village, RegidiAmadalavalasa Mandal, Srikakulam District, for thepurpose of forming 40 feet road without initiating theproceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 (for short ‘the Act’), as illegal and arbitrary.
At the hearing, learned Assistant GovernmentPleader for Roads and Buildings, on instructions,submitted that the respondents have been takingmeasurements only for the purpose of assessing therequirement for widening of the road and that, beforeaffecting the properties belonging to the petitioners, therespondents will make the verification of the ownershipof the petitioners and initiate appropriate land acquisitionproceedings on being satisfied that the petitioners arethe owners of such properties.
This submission of the learned AssistantGovernment Pleader is placed on record and the WritPetition is, accordingly, disposed of.
As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition,W.P.M.P.No.45593 of 2012 filed by the petitioners forinterim relief is dismissed as infructuous.
____________________________
JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA
REDDY
31[st] January 2012DR