Telangana High Court
WP/28480/2021 of THODETI RAJAIAH Vs THE STATE OF TELANGANA on 31 December 2021
THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (SPecial Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY , THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEI\4BER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRIJUSTICE T'VINOD KUMAR WRIT PETI TION NO:2 800F 2021 Between: THODETI RAJAIAH, S/o Narayana, Aged about 40 vears' Occ Aqriculture'
HIGH COURT FOR [THE STATE ][OF ][TELANGANA AT ][HYDERABAD](SPecial Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY ,THE [THIRTY FIRST ][DAY ][OF ][DECEI\4BER]TWO THOUSAND AND [TWENTY ][ONE]
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE [SRIJUSTICE T'VINOD ][KUMAR]
WRIT PETI[TION ][NO:2]800F 2021
Between:THODETI [RAJAIAH, S/o Narayana, Aged about 40 vears' ][Occ ][Aqriculture']R/o H. No.2_64, [enoapaiii ][vii;d;, ][v;is;iooi ][wtanoat,'Lastial District.]
...PETITIONER
AND
1. THE STATE [OF ][TELANGANA, Rep ][by ][its.Principal Secretary']P;;#i;in- [n"l ][o"puttrnent, secr6taiiat' ][Hvderabad]P;;#i;in- [n"l ][o"puttrnent, secr6taiiat' ][Hvderabad]
2.THEDISTRICTCOLLECTOR'(PANCHAYATHS)'JagtialDistrict
3. THE [DISTRICT PANCHAYATH OFFICER' Jagtial ][District]
4. THE PANCHAYATH [SECRETARY' Grampanchayath ][Allipur' ][Raikal]Mandal, [Jagtial District']Mandal, [Jagtial District']
5. THE [TAHSILDAR, Raikal Mandal' Jagtial District]
S/o Late [Tharik ][Ali']6. NNOHD.KHAJA [QUTHUBUDDIN ][ANd ][IT/AQBOOL]o AlliPur [Village, ][Raikal]Aoed about [sz ][years,6iJ ][private ][Employee' ][R/]lrlindal, Jagtial [District']Aoed about [sz ][years,6iJ ][private ][Employee' ][R/]lrlindal, Jagtial [District']
t 53 vears, [Occ']Village, [Raikal]Village, [Raikal]
'5,q{I;#is,iN}-?',':ft:lHlrfi [,xtTtlt"t?,:ifi ][l'lY]
.RESPONDENTS
Petition [under ][Article ][226 ][ofthe ][Constitution ][of ][lndia ][praying ][that ][in]fit" #ii""it [filed-therewith' the High Court ][may]the circumstan""t 't't"i"il bepleasedtopassu""'0",."ii'ectionor*'it..not"particularlyoneintheillegal [action ][of]nature - [of ][writ ][of ][mandall;"#i;;;g ][th"t'igr1-hIno"o "no ]tnt n". po n o-" "', * " i -N [ii:lily;,':.; l;i mi"f ,i ?'1" 1,,] T# ?.'iiTrans{er [of ][ProPertY ][u]t",tiii f a v o [u ]r [of ][Re ][s p o ][n ][d-e ][nt ]o' ;" [i ]; [;'g"'"t ]91 f :, i#ill ;"" '[u;-l,.s"i Ni;-'i-azrt' admeasurins 995 ::I:i"""",n"'..'-"s"' Notice, DaGd"t'it"Jy[;* l[x;l [*1.] ][?3: ][":i';::iii':T{r'"",rii ]sT}H B,?,,;,ffii; [efl ][:i]"01:ro,hozt more particularlv [Judsemen' ]?l:,,"r';;J, X.-.ragtiar -o and alsos lr o 34 8 orH.:,H [:Al*,, ][f,1":",ff ][,li"e ][iJ ][*i ]iilli"' [!i, ][; ][";i ][;a ][i ][a ]as'it [i ][n ][bein-g ][illesal']2018 arbitrary, on [the ][unconstitutrJ;:[;;-i; ][file ]"t ''li"ip'i L'nior "iolation [Civil ]"9i;oi0|.,"ipr". 'iugtiur [of ][natura| ]['iustice]and consequ"ntry [,"il"lio" ][in" ][rransrer ][or ][E;iltt:f"";llXi,fi;?iit]13t10t2021 [in ][File ][No APP ][64 ][issued ][il ]-1i:"i;"";nriri[o'it"o [structures]ni;"",'?;' [otti"i"t ][Respondents ][t-o ][remSv-e]carried [out ][bv ][the ][*"'?X"'ii" ][N]o'7o'Lt ][the above said ][property]
lA NO: 2 OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to SUSPEND the Certificate of Transfer of Property Dated1311012021 in File No.APP.64 issued by Respondent No.4 in favour ofRespondent No.7
lA NO: 1OF 2021
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstancesstated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bestated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may bepleased to DIRECT the official Respondents to stop the constructionactivities carried out by the Respondent No.7 over the non-existing houseactivities carried out by the Respondent No.7 over the non-existing houseproperty bearing H.No.1- 8217, admeasuring 605 sq.yds situated at AllipurVillage, Raikal ltrlandal, Jagtial District which forms part of subject property Counsel for the Petitioner:SRl. G RAJESHWAR REDDy 9g.ln-:"1_tg-r [the Respondents ][No ][1 ][to ][3: ][Gp FoR ][pANcHAyAT ]RAJ ANDRURAL DEVELOPMENT
!g111gt_ror [the Respondent ][No ][4: ][sRl ][G.NARENDER ]REDDY, SC FORZPPIMPP
Counsel for the Respondent No 5: Gp FOR REVENUEthe Respondent No 5: Gp FOR REVENUE
Counsel for the Respondents No 6 and 7: _-the Respondents No 6 and 7: _- The Court made the following: ORDER
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.VINOD KUMAR
WRITPEoNNo.28480 of 2021
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Leamed counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the court towithdraw this Writ petition with libety to avail rhe remedy underSection 121 of the Telangana panchayatn Raj Act,20lg.withdraw this Writ petition with libety to avail rhe remedy underSection 121 of the Telangana panchayatn Raj Act,20lg.
Granting liberty as sought, this Writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No costs.withdrawn. No costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed.
SD/. T.TIRUMALA DEVI.ASSISTANT REGISTBAR//TRUE COPY//\\//SECTION OFFICER
To,
"1. One CC to Sri. G RAJESHWAR REDDY Advocate IOPUC]IOPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development ,High Courtfor the State of Telangana. [OUT]for the State of Telangana. [OUT]
3. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE,High Court for the State of Telangana.lourllourl
4. One CC to Sri Cj Narender Reddy, SC for ZPPII\4PP (OPUC)
5. Two CD Copies
6. One Spare Copy.
rsnSW
tv
I
HIGH [COURT]
DATED:31 [t1212021]
csITt{Y'\)Ct11 [lh}l2s2].}':lo/?{rORDERWP.No.28480 of [2021]
DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITIONWITHOUT COSTS
\0[il2r']q\'lk