Telangana High Court
CRP/750/2015 of KUSHNAPALLY , DURGAM MALLAIAH, ADILABAD DIST Vs GODISELA GOPALA REDDY, ADILABAD DIST on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAO FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 750 OF 2015 Petition under Adlcle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated 1311012014
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANAAT HYDERABAO
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEIVBERTWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY ONE
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE P.SREE SUDHA
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 750 OF 2015
Petition under Adlcle 227 of Constitution of lndia, aggrieved by the Order dated1311012014 in EA No.S of 2013 in EP No.10 of 2013 in OS No.33 ot 2012 on the file ofthe Court of the file of Junior Civil Judge, Chinnur.
Between:
Kushnapally @ Durgam ti/allaiah,
...PETITIONER/PETITIONER/ DHR
AND
Godisela Gopala Reddy, S/o Chinna Ashi Reddy,
...RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/ JDR
CRPMP. NO: 990 OF 2015
Petition under Section 151 of CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be [pleased ]to [grant ][police ]aiddirecting the S.H.O., P.S. Kotapally to [provide ][police ]aid to the [petitioner ]in respect ofthe land in Sy.No.403/1 admeasuring Ac.3-07 [guntas ]and Sy.No.403/2 admeasuringAc.3-00 guntas, both are in one compact area, situated. at, Pullagaom village,Kotapalty Mandal, Adilabad District, pending disposal of the Civil Revision Petition For the Petitioner : SRI P.LAKSHMA REDDY, Advocate For the Respondent : NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
To
THE HOII'BLE [SMT. ][JUSTICE ][P. SREE ][SUDHA]
CML I:EVISION [PETITION No'75O ][of ][2015]
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This C.R' [P' ][is ][filed ][questioning ][the ][order ][passed in]
E.A.No.S of [20 ][3 ][in ][E'P'No'10 of ][20 ][13 ][in ][O S'No ][33 ol ][2Ol2]dated13.|o.2o14onthefileofJuniorCivilJudge,Chinnur.
As per th': [case ][status ][information' ][E ][P'No' 10 ][of ][2013 in]O.S.No.33 of [lO12 ][on ][the file of ][the Junior ][Civil ][Judge']Chinnur [itself ]['vas disposed ][of ][on ][23'8'2019']
Therefort , this [Civil ][Revision ][Petition ][is ][dismissed ][as]infructuous. [I ][o ][order ][as ][to ][costs' ][Misceilaneous petitions]pending, if [anl ], [shall stand ][closed']
SdIK.VENKAIAHASSISTANT [REGISTRAR]jt//..\SECTICiN [OFFICER]
,TRUE [COPY//]
1. rhe [Junior ][civir Ju ][rs_er€hUilffll1i"XX['?331"1]
2. One [CC ][to Sri ][P'Lt ][ksnm]
3. Two [CD Copies]
4. One [SPare ][CoPY]
Kj
\\
HIGH COURTDATED:3111212021
t
ORDERCRP.No.750 of [20'15]
DISMISSING THE CR] AS INFRUCTUOUS, [WITHOUT ][COSTS.]
G"{[\),\]r'' [-) ]--))-*