Telangana High Court

WP/18997/1997 of Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, on 31 December 2004

Cites 0, Cited by 0

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.18997 of 1997 Between: Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. .....

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR

PRESENT

THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA

WRIT PETITION No.18997 of 1997

Between:

Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Kakinada, E.G.Dist.

..... PETITIONER

AND

1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep.by it's Presiding Officer, A.P.,Hyerabad.

2 Regional Transport Authority, rep.by it's Secretary, Kakinada E.G.Dist.

3 Ch. Nagalakshmi, C/o. Sri P.Rajagopalachary, 1-9-34/3A, Ramnagar, Hyderabad -500 050.

.....RESPONDENTS

Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of a WritCertiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt.22.4.97 made inA.P.No. 89/95 on the file of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., HyderabadSetting aside the order dt.28.12.1994 in item No.10 in R.No.9413/A2/93 of theRegional Transport Authority, E.G.Dist , Kakinada and directing to issue permit tothe 3rd respondent on the route G.B Stand to Kadiyam and quash the same as beingillegal ,without jurisdiction and invalid.

Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVASA RAO

Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Govt.Pleader for Temple.

The Court made the following Order:

It is represented that the question involved in this writ petition is covered by thedecision of the full bench of this Court in A.P.S.R.T.C & others Vs. State TransportAppellate Tribunal.

In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.

______________

P.S.NARAYANA, J

Dated : 31[st] December, 2004.

Sh

To

1 The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P.,Hyerabad.

2 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kakinada E.G.Dist. Kakinada E.G.Dist.

3 2CD copies

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead