Telangana High Court
WP/18997/1997 of Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Vs State Transport Appellate Tribunal, on 31 December 2004
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOUR PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA WRIT PETITION No.18997 of 1997 Between: Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Kakinada, E.G.Dist. .....
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY FIRST DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND FOUR
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.S.NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.18997 of 1997
Between:
Divisional Manager,A.P.S.R.T.C, Kakinada, E.G.Dist.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1 State Transport Appellate Tribunal, Rep.by it's Presiding Officer, A.P.,Hyerabad.
2 Regional Transport Authority, rep.by it's Secretary, Kakinada E.G.Dist.
3 Ch. Nagalakshmi, C/o. Sri P.Rajagopalachary, 1-9-34/3A, Ramnagar, Hyderabad -500 050.
.....RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in thecircumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will be pleased toissue an appropriate Writ, order or direction, especially in the nature of a WritCertiorari, calling for the records relating to the impugned order dt.22.4.97 made inA.P.No. 89/95 on the file of the State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P., HyderabadSetting aside the order dt.28.12.1994 in item No.10 in R.No.9413/A2/93 of theRegional Transport Authority, E.G.Dist , Kakinada and directing to issue permit tothe 3rd respondent on the route G.B Stand to Kadiyam and quash the same as beingillegal ,without jurisdiction and invalid.
Counsel for the Petitioner:MR.K.SRINIVASA RAO
Counsel for the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 : Govt.Pleader for Temple.
The Court made the following Order:
It is represented that the question involved in this writ petition is covered by thedecision of the full bench of this Court in A.P.S.R.T.C & others Vs. State TransportAppellate Tribunal.
In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed. No costs.
______________
P.S.NARAYANA, J
Dated : 31[st] December, 2004.
Sh
To
1 The Presiding Officer, State Transport Appellate Tribunal, A.P.,Hyerabad.
2 The Secretary, Regional Transport Authority, Kakinada E.G.Dist. Kakinada E.G.Dist.
3 2CD copies