Telangana High Court
CRLP/15027/2013 of Md. Anwar Pasha Vs The State of Andhar Pradesh, on 30 December 2013
R.KANTHA RAO CRL.P.No.15027 of 2013 ORDER The petitioner–A1 apprehends arrest in P.C.O.R.No.601/2013-14 of 2013 of Prohibition & Excise Police Station, Gadwal registered for the offences punishable under Sections 34 ( a ) & 37 ( a ) of A.P.Excise Act, 1968 read with Section 4 (
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Arguments
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.KANTHA RAO
ORDER
CRL.P.No.15027 of 2013
The petitioner–A1 apprehends arrest inP.C.O.R.No.601/2013-14 of 2013 of Prohibition & Excise PoliceStation, Gadwal registered for the offences punishable underSections 34 (a) & 37 (a) of A.P.Excise Act, 1968 read withSection 4 (a) and 5 (a) of A.P. Chloral Hydrate Rules, 1973.
Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner andlearned Additional Public Prosecutor representing therespondent-State.
According to the prosecution, some material was seizedin the land of A1 which is meant for manufacturing ID arrack.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits thatA1 leased out the land to A2.
The prosecution version is that both A1 and A2 involvedin manufacture of ID arrack.
In that view of the matter, I am not inclined to grantanticipatory bail to the petitioner.
Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is dismissed.
_____________
R.KANTHA RAO,J
30[th] December, 2013rkk