Telangana High Court
WP/23079/2000 of D. Chandra Leela Vs The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, on 30 December 2008
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY WRIT PETITION No.23079 of 2000 Between: D. Chandra Leela, W/o. Late D. Raju, R/o.D.No.13-46/3, Patha
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD(Special Original Jurisdiction)
TUESDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF DECEMBERTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTPRESENT
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDYWRIT PETITION No.23079 of 2000
Between:
D. Chandra Leela, W/o. Late D. Raju, R/o.D.No.13-46/3,Patha Cuddapah, Cuddapah District
... PETITIONER
AND
1 The Vice Chairman and Managing Director, A.P.S.R.T.C., Musheerabad, Hyderabad.
2 The Regional Manager, A.P.S.R.T.C., Cuddapah Region, Cuddapah, Cuddapah Dist.
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying thatin the circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Courtmay be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly onein the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2ndRespondent in not appointing the petitioner as sweeper by hisproceedings No.E1/329(19)/2000-RM 'C' dated 22-6-2000 oncompassionate grounds illegal and arbitrary and consequently directthe respondents to appoint the petitioner in the post of Sweeper/Officegirl under Bread winner scheme.
Counsel for the Petitioner: Mr. D. Kodandarami Reddy Counsel for the Respondents: Smt. W.V.S. Rajeswari The Court made the following:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
Order:
Learned counsel for the petitioner addressed letter dated 26-12-2008 to the Registry to get the writ petition listed under the caption ‘for withdrawal’.
In view of the said letter, the writ petition is dismissed aswithdrawn. No order as to costs.
December 30, 2008MRR
_______________________
R. SUBHASH REDDY, J.