Telangana High Court
WP/29212/2013 of Sk.Ameen Vs Dr. Y.S.R. Horticultural University, on 30 December 2013
SRI JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALI WRIT PETITION No.29212 of 2013 Date: 30.12.2013 Between : Sk.Ameen and another .… Petitioners and Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, rep. by its Registrar, Admn. Office, Venkataramannagudem, West Godavari District. …. Respondent THE COURT MADE THE
Date: 30.12.2013
Between :
Sk.Ameen and another
.… Petitioners
and
Dr.Y.S.R. Horticultural University, rep. by itsRegistrar, Admn. Office, Venkataramannagudem,West Godavari District.
…. Respondent
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Having regard to the short relief sought for by thepetitioners to direct the respondent to pass appropriate orders onthe representations dated 20.09.2013 submitted by the petitionerswithin a time frame, this writ petition is being disposed of at theadmission stage after hearing Sri B.Nagi Reddy, learned counselappearing for the petitioners as well as Sri C.Srinivasa Baba,learned Standing Counsel for respondent.
2. The petitioners state that they have been working as CasualLabourers in the Horticulture Research Stations, Mallial andMallepally, West Godavari District and have become eligible forbeing appointed as Agricultural Extension Officers. PetitionerNo.1 has put in more than 23 years of service and petitioner No.2has put in more than 21 years of service. They submittedrepresentations dated 20.09.2013 to the respondent with a requestto regularize their services in the said post. The grievance of thepetitioners is that though considerable time has elapsed, therespondent has not taken any action.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the respondentis not likely to consider the representations within a reasonable time, in which event, the petitioners would suffer great hardship. The learned counsel, therefore, seeks a direction to therespondent to pass appropriate orders on the said representationswithin a time frame.
4. Sri C.Srinivasa Baba, learned Standing Counsel has noobjection to grant such a limited direction.
5. In view of the above, without expressing any opinion on themerits of the case, this writ petition is disposed of directing therespondent to consider the representations dated 20.09.2013submitted by the petitioners and pass appropriate orders inaccordance with law as expeditiously as possible, preferablywithin a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy ofthis order. No order as to costs.
6. In view of the disposal of the writ petition, W.P.M.P.No.36285 of2013 is dismissed as unnecessary.
________________________
JUSTICE NOUSHAD ALIDate: 30.12.2013.TJMR
TJMR
WRIT PETITION No.29212 of 2013
Date: 30.12.2013