Telangana High Court
WP/37809/2012 of Varanasi Venkata Satya Subrahmanya Vs The District Registrar, on 28 December 2012
SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.37809 of 2012 Date: 28.12.2012 Between: Varanasi Venkata Satya Subrahmanya and others … Petitioners And The District Registrar and another … Respondents Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T. Radha Rani Counsel for the respondents:
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNAREDDY
WRIT PETITION No.37809 of 2012
Date: 28.12.2012
Between:
Varanasi Venkata Satya Subrahmanya and others … Petitioners
And
The District Registrar and another
… Respondents
Counsel for the petitioners: Sri T. Radha Rani Counsel for the respondents: AssistantGovernment Pleader for Revenue The Court made the following :
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
The innocuous grievance of the petitioners in this writ petitionis that respondent No.1 has not been disposing of the petitioners’representation dated 04.08.2012 for rectification of the extent of landshown in the registered sale deed bearing No.7500/81 dated16.09.1981.
At the hearing, learned Assistant Government Pleader forRevenue expressed a doubt whether the power of rectification of thedocument is available with respondent No.1 or not.
In my opinion, respondent No.1 needs to examine therepresentation of the petitioners at first. If power to rectify thedocument as requested by the petitioners exists in him, he shallaccept the petitioners’ request. In a converse situation, he shallpass appropriate order on the petitioners’ representation. Respondent No.1 shall complete this exercise and communicate hisdecision to the petitioners within a period of one month from thedate of receipt of a copy of this order.
Subject to the above directions, the Writ Petition is disposedof.
As a sequel, W.P.M.P.No.47959 of 2012 shall stand disposedof as infructuous.
______________________
(C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J)
28[th] December, 2012GHN