Telangana High Court
WP/4875/1999 of P.VENKATESWARA RAO Vs PROJECT DIRECTOR/DRDA/KAKINADA AND 3 ORS on 30 December 1999
COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND EIGHT PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHAN WRIT PETITION NO : 4875 of 1999 Between: P. Venkateswara Rao, S/o P. Veeraradha Swamy, aged about 39
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE, ANDHRA PRADESH AT HYDERABAD
(Special Original Jurisdiction)TUESDAY, THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARYTWO THOUSAND AND EIGHTPRESENTTHE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION NO : 4875 of 1999
Between:
P. Venkateswara Rao, S/o P. Veeraradha Swamy, aged about 39 years,working as Section Writer, District Rural Development Agency, Kakinda, EastGodavari District.
..... PETITIONER
AND
1.Project Director, District Rural Development Authority, Kakinada,East Godavari District.East Godavari District.
2.The District Collector and Chairman, District Rural DevelopmentAuthority, Kakinada, East Godavari District.Authority, Kakinada, East Godavari District.
3.The Commissioner of Panchayat Raj and Rural Development,Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.Andhra Pradesh, Hyderabad.
4.The Secretary to the Government, Panchayat Raj & RuralDevelopment, Secretariat, Hyderabad.Development, Secretariat, Hyderabad.
.....RESPONDENT(S)
Petition under Article 226 of the constitution of India praying that inthe circumstances stated in the Affidavit filed herein the High Court will bepleased to Counsel for the Petitioner: MR.GOPALA RAO GANDRAKOTA
Counsel for the Respondent No.: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ &RURAL DEV.
The Court made the following :
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAMESH RANGANATHANWRIT PETITION No. 4875 OF 1999
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
Both Mrs. Meenakshi Prasoonamba, learned Counselappearing on behalf of Sri Gopala Rao Gandrakota, learned Counselfor the petitioner and the Government Pleader for Panchayat Rajwould agree that, in view of the order passed by the Government inG.O.Ms. No. 101 dated 10.04.2003 regularising the services of thepetitioner as a Junior Assistant, no further orders need be passed inthis writ petition and the writ petition has become infructuous. Thewrit petition is, accordingly, dismissed.
_______________________________
Date: 26.02.2008RAMESH RANGANATHAN, JMRKR
To
1.2CCs to2.2CD copies
Form-NIC-OGS/WP{}