Telangana High Court
LPA/255/1993 of - Vs - on 2 December 1993
B. PRAKASH RAO AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD L.P.A.Nos. 254/1992, 255/1992 and 230/1993 Date: 08-02-2011 Between: Tammana Gundayya Gupta ……… Appellant and Mutnuri Subbalakshmi ……….. Respondent HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAOAND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASADL.P.A.Nos. 254/1992, 255/1992 and 230/1993Date: 08-02-2011
Between:Tammana Gundayya Gupta
……… Appellant
and
Mutnuri Subbalakshmi
……….. Respondent
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. PRAKASH RAO
ANDHON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. DURGA PRASAD
L.P.A.Nos. 254/1992, 255/1992 and 230/1993
COMMON ORDER:(Per BPR, J)
Though the matters have come up yesterday, none appears andno representation. Even today, when the matters are called, noneappears and no representation.
Hence, Letter Patent Appeals are dismissed for default. No costs.
_________________
B. PRAKASH RAO, J
Date: 08-02-2011YCR
__________________P. DURGA PRASAD, J
Page 1 of 1
Loading citations and judicial treatment…