Telangana High Court
CRP/440/2020 of Nagara Simhachalam Vs The Union of India and another on 31 December 2021
COURT FOR ot r"oT*to?HE oF TELANGANA FRIDAY, THE THIRTY F rw o rir o ui n r,i'fi,,.J Rfl I roI"oo.,g5 *. * PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY l.A.No .1 0F 2021 IVIL R VI toN AND ET TION N 44 F 2020 Between: Nagara Simhachalam, Wo_. ^l9te_ Nagara Ramaiah, aged
,N THE H,GH COURT FOR
FORot r"oT*to?HE [oF ][TELANGANA]
F*rw o rir o ui n r,i'fi,,.J Rfl I roI"oo.,g5 *. rw o rir o ui n r,i'fi,,.J Rfl I roI"oo.,g5 *.
FRIDAY, THE THIRTY F
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A.VENKATESHWARA REDDY
l.A.No.1 0F 2021ANDIVIL RVI toNET TION N44F 2020
l.A,No.1 OF 2021
Between:
Nagara Simhachalam, Wo_. Occ.House wife, R/o. H.No.1-24, ^l9te_ patha-rega [Nagara ]Vittage, [Ramaiah, ]Raminadrapuram ff,flrOrl,[aged ][about ][6.1 ][years,]Vizianagaram District.
...Petitioner
AND
1. The Union of lndia, represented by its General lr/anager, East coast Railways,Bhubaneshwar.Bhubaneshwar.
2. Nagara Ramayya, (died).
...Respondents
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated inthe affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order,clarifying the orders passed in l.A.No.2 of 2020 in C.R.P.No.440 of 2020 dated.211112021 the sole [petitioner ]to [withdraw ][the ][total ][awarded], by [permitting ]compensation i.e. Rs.8,00,0001 [in O.A. ][ll ][(u).No. ][53 ][of ][2014 daled.27l12l2O1B'in]the interest of [justice.]the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to pass an order,clarifying the orders passed in l.A.No.2 of 2020 in C.R.P.No.440 of 2020 dated.211112021 the sole [petitioner ]to [withdraw ][the ][total ][awarded], by [permitting ]compensation i.e. Rs.8,00,0001 [in O.A. ][ll ][(u).No. ][53 ][of ][2014 daled.27l12l2O1B'in]the interest of [justice.]
PetitionunderArticle22TollheConstitutionoflndia,aggrievedbytheorderdated.o3.o4.2019 [passed in ][r.A.No.31 ][of 2019 in ][o.A. ][ll ][(u).No, ][53 ot2o14 ][on ][thefile ][of]the Court [of ][the Railway Claims Tribunal Secunderabad Bench' ][at ][Secunderabad']
Between:
Nagara Simhachalam, [W/o. late ][Nagara Ramaiah' ][aged about ][61-.years']O.i-Hor.u wife, [Fl/o. H.No-1-24, PathJrega ][Village, ][Ramabadrapuram Mandal']Vizianagaram District
... Petitioner/Petitione [r/Claimant]
AND
1. The Union of India, [represented ][by ][its General Manager, East Coast ][Railways,]Bhubaneshwar, Orissa State.Bhubaneshwar, Orissa State.
...RespondenURespondenURespondent
2. Nagara Ramayya, [(died).]
...RespondenUPetitioner/Applicant
. Counsel for the Petitioner: M/s S. CHANDRASEKHAR
Counsel forthe RespondentNo.l: SRI PUSHPINDER KAURCounsel for the Respondent No.2: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICtr A. VENKATESI{WARA REDDYIA No.I of 2021 and CRP No.110 0f 2020
Citations and Judicial Treatment
Cited by
0
Decisions in the index citing it
Cites
0
Decisions referred to
In this index
0
Of the decisions it cites
Overruled / Questioned
0
No negative treatment found
Loading the citing and cited decisions…
This judgment in the centre: on the left the decisions it cites, on the right the decisions citing it. Colour is the treatment; choose a decision to open it.
ORDER:
This revision is fired by the petitioner/craimant under Section115 ofthe Civil procedure Code against the respondent, aggrieved bythe order dated 03.04.2019 in OA II (u) No.53 of 2014 on the file ofthe learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench.Secunderabad.the order dated 03.04.2019 in OA II (u) No.53 of 2014 on the file ofthe learned Railway Claims Tribunal, Secunderabad Bench.Secunderabad.
As per the order dated O2.Il.ZOZI, vide IA No.2 of 2020, thisCourt has permitted the petitioner/claimant to withdraw the amount interms of the orders passed in Railway Claims Tribunal in OA II (u)No.53 of 2014,dated27.12)0 18, but a clarification petition, vide IANo.1 of 2021 is filed stating that il in terms of the order, it is onlyRs.25,000/- was permitted to be withdrawLi At this stage, the leamed counsei lor [the ][petitioner ][and ][the]respondent have submitted [that ][the respondent ][has ][no ][objection ][for ][the]petitioner/claimant withdrawing [the ][entire ][amount ][of ][Rs'8 ][lakhs]deposited.
Therefore, [while ][recording the ][above ][said submission' ][without]looking into the [merits or ][otherwise ][of ][the ][Civil ][Revision ][Petition' ][the]claimant [is ][permitted ][to ][withdraw ][the ][entire ][amount]petitioneri deposited. [Accordingly, ][as ][submitted ][by the ][leamed counsel ][for ][the]respondent, [since ][the ][petitioner ][is ][permitted ][to ][withdraw the ][entire]
\
amount [deposited' ][no ][purpose ][would ][be ][served ][in ][keeping the ][revision]
petition Pending'
In the [result' ]' [IA ][No'1 ][of ][2021 is ][allowed ][and ][consequently' ][the]Civil [Revision ][Petition ][is ][also ][disposed ][of' ][confirming ][the ][order ][dated]27.12.2018in [OA ][ll ][(u) ][No'53 ][of ][2014 ][on ][the ][fi1e ][of ][the ][Railway]Claims [Tribunal' ][Secunderabad ][Bench' However' there shall ][be ][no]order [as ][to ][costs. ][Misce,aneous ][applications, ][if ][any ][pending ][in ][this]
tion shall [stand ][closed']
revision Peti
SD/.K.A[MMAJI]ASSTST[ANT ][REGISTRAR],/TRUE [COPY//]SECTION [OFFICER]
Tonderabad' 1.2r), H: H fliiltlffiffiT#Trffi1]?:lftlf 4. Two [CD CoPies]5. One [SPare ][CoPY]MMKTR -- HIGH [COURT]
DAIED,.3111212021
ORDER
l.A.No.1 of [202'l]andCRP.No.440 [ot ][2020]
1gE [$la]c[?'.]7t:)2 B,t'tq 2122
ALLOWING THE l.A.No.1 OF 2021AND [DISPOSING ][OF]THE CIVIL REVISION PETITION
\O-!P