Telangana High Court

CRLRC/3236/2015 of G.Reddaiah Reddy Vs Smt K.Sasikala, on 31 December 2015

Cites 0, Cited by 0

RAJA ELANGO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3236 of 2015 ORDER: 1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner-accused aggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.163 of 2015 in Crl.A.No.415 of 2015 by the V Additional Sessions Judge, Tirupati. 2. The petitioner was

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3236 of 2015

Citations and Judicial Treatment

No citing decisions in the index yet

Cited by

0

Decisions in the index citing it

Cites

0

Decisions referred to

In this index

0

Of the decisions it cites

Overruled / Questioned

0

No negative treatment found

Loading the citing and cited decisions…

ORDER:

1. This Criminal Revision Case is filed by the petitioner-accusedaggrieved by the order dated 18.12.2015 passed in Crl.M.P.No.163 of2015 in Crl.A.No.415 of 2015 by the V Additional Sessions Judge,Tirupati.

2. The petitioner was convicted and sentenced to undergo simpleimprisonment for a period of one year and to pay a fine of Rs.5,000/- indefault to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of three months forthe offence punishable under Sections 138 r/w 142 of the NegotiableInstruments Act by the learned V Additional Judicial Magistrate of FirstClass, Tirupati, in C.C.No.296 of 2015, vide judgment dated6.11.2015. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed the aboveCriminal Appeal before the learned V Additional Sessions Judge,Tirupati. Along with the appeal, the petitioner filed the above Crl.M.P.seeking suspension of the sentence imposed by the trial Court. Thelearned Additional Sessions Judge while suspending the sentence ofimprisonment pending disposal of the Criminal Appeal, on the sameterms and conditions imposed by the trial Court, imposed anothercondition directing the petitioner-accused to deposit a sum ofRs.50,000/- before the trial Court on or before 31.12.2015. It was alsoobserved that if the petitioner fails to comply with the condition ofdeposit of Rs.50,000/- within the time stipulated, the above Crl.M.P.shall stand dismissed. Aggrieved by the same, the petitioner filed thisrevision.

3. Heard and perused the material available on record.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to pass the following order:

The condition imposed by the learned V AdditionalSessions Judge, Tirupati, in Crl.M.P.No.163 of 2015 inCrl.A.No.415 of 2015 i.e., ‘‘the petitioner/appellant/accusedshall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/- before the trial Court on orbefore 31.12.2015, failing which, the petition shall standdismissed”, is suspended. Rest of the order under revisionshall remain. The learned V Additional Sessions Judge,Tirupati is directed to dispose of the appeal as expeditiouslyas possible.”

5. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall standclosed.

_____________________

JUSTICE RAJA ELANGODated: 31[st] December, 2015Nn Nn THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAJA ELANGO

CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.3236 of 2015

31.12.2015

You have used today's free searches. Sign in, for free, to keep searching without a limit.

Compass reads the judgments for you and finds the paragraphs for and against your question. Sign in to use it.

My Vault follows judgments for you and records every later decision that cites them. Sign in to keep one.

Sign in to download the court's PDF. The full text stays free to read here.

Sign in, for free, to download the court copy. Reading the full text here stays open to everyone.

Search and read Indian judgments without limits, save them to My Vault and find the relevant paragraphs with Compass.

Open the sign-in page instead